ArticleIEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology2021
Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography and Transient Optical Coherence Elastography: Side-by-Side Comparison of Repeatability and Accuracy.
Article in IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phantoms for use in optical coherence elastography.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Review
- Article
- Four-Dimensional Sequential Elastography for Ocular Tissue Using 2D Matrix Array.BME frontiers · 2026Article
- Assessment of skin fibrosis in a murine model of systemic sclerosis with multifunctional optical coherence tomography.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Four-Dimensional (4D) Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography Using Sequential Excitation.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2025Article
- Article
- Continuous shear wave measurements for dynamic cardiac stiffness evaluation in pigs.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Nonlinear Elasticity Assessment with Optical Coherence Elastography for High-Selectivity Differentiation of Breast Cancer Tissues.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Compression optical coherence elastography versus strain ultrasound elastography for breast cancer detection and differentiation: pilot study.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
- Introduction to optical coherence elastography: tutorial.Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe compare the repeatability and accuracy of ultrasound shear wave elastography (USE) and transient optical coherence elastography (OCE).
methodsElastic wave speed in gelatin phantoms and chicken breast was measured with USE and OCE and compared with uniaxial mechanical compression testing. Intra- and Inter-repeatability were analyzed using Bland-Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).
resultsOCE and USE differed from uniaxial testing by a mean absolute percent error of 8.92% and 16.9%, respectively, across eight phantoms of varying stiffness. Upper and lower limits of agreement for intrasample repeatability for USE and OCE were ±0.075 m/s and -0.14 m/s and 0.13 m/s, respectively. OCE and USE both had ICCs of 0.9991. In chicken breast, ICC for USE was 0.9385 and for OCE was 0.9924.
conclusionOCE and USE can detect small speed changes and give comparable measurements. These measurements correspond well with uniaxial testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.