Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34179755›Full record

ArticleArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2021

Comparison of the Effects of Physiologic Saline Interfascial and Lidocaine Trigger Point Injections in Treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Anuphan Tantanatip, Wasa Patisumpitawong, Saridpong Lee

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07326982 (Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Interfascial Hydrodissection for Myofascial Pain Syndrome of the Gluteus Maximus in Patients With Piriformis Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07326982 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Interfascial Hydrodissection for Myofascial Pain Syndrome of the Gluteus Maximus in Patients With Piriformis Syndrome: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstanbul University - CerrahpasaRan2026 to 2026Enrolled42ConditionsPiriformis Syndrome, Gluteus Maximus Myofascial PainArmsUltrasound-Guided Interfascial Hydrodissection, Ultrasound-Guided Gluteus Maximus Dry Needling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ultrasound-Guided Fascial Hydrodissection with Eperisone: A Retrospective Study on Efficacy and Safety in Lumbodorsal Fasciitis Treatment.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anuphan TantanatipDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Chulabhorn Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Wasa PatisumpitawongDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Chulabhorn Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Saridpong LeeDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Chulabhorn Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chulabhorn Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the effects of physiological saline interfascial and lidocaine trigger point injections in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS).

designDouble-blind randomized controlled study.

settingDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine.

participantsEighty patients (N=80; 15 men, 65 women; mean age, 40.4±10.9y) with MPS in the upper trapezius muscle.

interventionsPatients were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: group 1 (n=40) received ultrasound-guided interfascial injection with physiological saline, and group 2 (n=40) underwent ultrasound-guided trigger point injection with lidocaine.

main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was pain scores measured by the visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included cervical range of motion (ROM) and adverse effects of the procedure. The outcomes were assessed before treatment and 10 minutes, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks after treatment.

resultsLidocaine trigger point injection showed higher VAS score improvement at 10 minutes after the procedure (

conclusionPhysiologic saline interfascial and lidocaine trigger point injections effectively decreased MPS pain in the upper trapezius muscle at 2 and 4 weeks after treatment. However, lidocaine trigger point injection demonstrated better pain improvement at 10 minutes after treatment.

Indexed as

InjectionsLidocaineMPS, myofascial pain syndromeMyofascial pain syndromesRehabilitationROM, range of motionTrigger pointsVAS, visual analog scale

Identifiers

PMID34179755
PMCPMC8211995
OpenAlexW3135546899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.