Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34179750›Full record

ArticleArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2021

Improving the Delivery of Function-Directed Care During Acute Hospitalizations: Methods to Develop and Validate the Functional Assessment in Acute Care Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Test (FAMCAT).

Andrea L Cheville, Chun Wang, Kathleen J Yost, Jeanne A Teresi, Mildred Ramirez, Katja Ocepek-Welikson, Pengsheng Ni, Elizabeth Marfeo, Tamra Keeney, Jeffrey R Basford and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Does the Mode of PROM Administration Affect the Responses of Hospitalized Patients?Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2022
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea L ChevilleDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Chun WangCollege of Education, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Kathleen J YostDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Jeanne A TeresiResearch Division, Hebrew Home at Riverdale, Riverdale, New York.
Mildred RamirezResearch Division, Hebrew Home at Riverdale, Riverdale, New York.
Katja Ocepek-WeliksonResearch Division, Hebrew Home at Riverdale, Riverdale, New York.
Pengsheng NiSchool of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Elizabeth MarfeoTufts University, Department of Occupational Therapy, Medford, Massachusetts.
Tamra KeeneyDivision of Palliative Care and Geriatric Medicine, Mongan Institute Center for Aging and Serious Illness, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jeffrey R BasfordDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
David J WeissDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Hebrew Home · USMayo Clinic · USBoston University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USNew York Psychoanalytic Society and Institute · USTufts University · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Residing in the Community with Dementia at the End of Life: Understanding Hospice Use and Residential SettingP30AG028741 · NIA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI ORNA INTRATOR · 2010 to 2026
$21.9M
Pilot CoreP30AG022845 · NIA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Manney Carrington Reid · 2003 to 2026
$15.2M
Computerized Adaptive Testing to Direct Delivery of Hospital-Based RehabilitationR01HD079439 · NICHD · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI CHEVILLE, ANDREA LYNNE · 2015 to 2019
$3.7M
AHRQ HHS T32 HS000011NIA NIH HHS P30 AG022845NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028741NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD079439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo (1) develop a patient-reported, multidomain functional assessment tool focused on medically ill patients in acute care settings; (2) characterize the measure's psychometric performance; and (3) establish clinically actionable score strata that link to easily implemented mobility preservation plans.

designThis article describes the approach that our team pursued to develop and characterize this tool, the Functional Assessment in Acute Care Multidimensional Computer Adaptive Test (FAMCAT). Development involved a multistep process that included (1) expanding and refining existing item banks to optimize their salience for hospitalized patients; (2) administering candidate items to a calibration cohort; (3) estimating multidimensional item response theory models; (4) calibrating the item banks; (5) evaluating potential multidimensional computerized adaptive testing (MCAT) enhancements; (6) parameterizing the MCAT; (7) administering it to patients in a validation cohort; and (8) estimating its predictive and psychometric characteristics.

settingA large (2000-bed) Midwestern Medical Center.

participantsThe overall sample included 4495 adults (2341 in a calibration cohort, 2154 in a validation cohort) who were admitted either to medical services with at least 1 chronic condition or to surgical/medical services if they required readmission after a hospitalization for surgery (N=4495).

interventionNot applicable.

main outcome measuresNot applicable.

resultsThe FAMCAT is an instrument designed to permit the efficient, precise, low-burden, multidomain functional assessment of hospitalized patients. We tried to optimize the FAMCAT's efficiency and precision, as well as its ability to perform multiple assessments during a hospital stay, by applying cutting edge methods such as the adaptive measure of change (AMC), differential item functioning computerized adaptive testing, and integration of collateral test-taking information, particularly item response times. Evaluation of these candidate methods suggested that all may enhance MCAT performance, but none were integrated into initial MCAT parameterization.

conclusionsThe FAMCAT has the potential to address a longstanding need for structured, frequent, and accurate functional assessment among patients hospitalized with medical diagnoses and complications of surgery.

Indexed as

Activities of daily livingAMC, Adaptive Measurement of ChangeAM-PAC, Activity Measure of Post-Acute CareCAT, computerized adaptive testingCognitionDIF, differential item functioningEHR, electronic health recordFAMCAT, Functional Assessment in Acute Care Multidimensional Computer Adaptive TestFAM, Functional Assessment for Acute Care MultidimensionalHIPAA, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996IRT, item response theoryMCAT, multidimensional computerized adaptive testingMGRM, multidimensional graded response modelMIRT, multidimensional item response theoryPAC, postacute carePH, physical functionPROMIS, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information SystemPROM, patient-reported outcome measureRehabilitationSF, short form

Identifiers

PMID34179750
PMCPMC8212002
OpenAlexW3129641635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.