Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34179575›Full record

ReviewRomanian journal of ophthalmology

Preoperative antisepsis in ophthalmic surgery (a review).

Alexandra-Cătălina Zaharia, Otilia-Maria Dumitrescu, Roxana-Elena Rogoz, Andreea Elena Dimirache, Mihail Zemba

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Romanian journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexandra-Cătălina ZahariaOphthalmology Department, "Dr. Carol Davila" Central Military Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Otilia-Maria DumitrescuOphthalmology Department, "Dr. Carol Davila" Central Military Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Roxana-Elena RogozOphthalmology Department, "Dr. Carol Davila" Central Military Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Andreea Elena DimiracheOphthalmology Department, "Dr. Carol Davila" Central Military Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Mihail ZembaOphthalmology Department, "Dr. Carol Davila" Central Military Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endophthalmitis remains a serious complication following intraocular procedures. Preoperative prophylactic measures for endophthalmitis decrease the morbidity associated with this disease and represent a standard of care prior to ophthalmic surgery. The literature supports as measures for ocular antisepsis: povidone-iodine solution for ocular surface preparation, chlorhexidine in patients with iodine allergy and application of topical antibiotics. Povidone-iodine is regarded as the most effective antiseptic associated with significant reduction in ocular surface bacterial counts. Currently, the recommended preoperative management is the application of 5% povidone-iodine solution in the conjunctival fornix, prior to surgery. This paper reviews the preoperative measures for ocular antisepsis, used in order to decrease the risk of culture-proven endophthalmitis.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective Agents, LocalEndophthalmitisAntisepsisConjunctivaHumansPovidone-IodineAnti-Infective Agents, LocalPovidone-Iodineantisepsisendophthalmitisophthalmic surgerypovidone-iodinepreoperative preparation

Identifiers

PMID34179575
PMCPMC8207863
OpenAlexW3176268061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.