Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34179451›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2021

Optimization of the image acquisition procedure in low-field MRI for non-destructive analysis of loin using predictive models.

Daniel Caballero, Trinidad Pérez-Palacios, Andrés Caro, Mar Ávila, Teresa Antequera

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 63% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Daniel CaballeroDepartment of Computer Systems and Telematics Engineering, University of Extremadura, Caceres, Spain.
Trinidad Pérez-PalaciosFood Technology Department and University of Extremadura, Caceres, Spain.
Andrés CaroDepartment of Computer Systems and Telematics Engineering, University of Extremadura, Caceres, Spain.
Mar ÁvilaDepartment of Computer Systems and Telematics Engineering, University of Extremadura, Caceres, Spain.
Teresa AntequeraFood Technology Department and University of Extremadura, Caceres, Spain.
Universidad de Extremadura · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of low-field magnetic resonance imaging (LF-MRI) scanners has increased in recent years. The low economic cost in comparison to high-field (HF-MRI) scanners and the ease of maintenance make this type of scanner the best choice for nonmedical purposes. However, LF-MRI scanners produce low-quality images, which encourages the identification of optimization procedures to generate the best possible images. In this paper, optimization of the image acquisition procedure for an LF-MRI scanner is presented, and predictive models are developed. The MRI acquisition procedure was optimized to determine the physicochemical characteristics of pork loin in a nondestructive way using MRI, feature extraction algorithms and data processing methods. The most critical parameters (relaxation times, repetition time, and echo time) of the LF-MRI scanner were optimized, presenting a procedure that could be easily reproduced in other environments or for other purposes. In addition, two feature extraction algorithms (gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) and one point fractal texture algorithm (OPFTA)) were evaluated. The optimization procedure was validated by using several evaluation metrics, achieving reliable and accurate results (

Indexed as

Central Composite DesignData MiningFeature extractionMRIOptimizationPredictive models

Identifiers

PMID34179451
PMCPMC8205300
OpenAlexW3166259372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.