Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34179333›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2021

Effects and clinical implications of sacubitril/valsartan on left ventricular reverse remodeling in patients affected by chronic heart failure: A 24-month follow-up.

Carla Paolini, Giacomo Mugnai, Chiara Dalla Valle, Andrea Volpiana, Alessandra Ferraglia, Anna Chiara Frigo, Claudio Bilato

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Efficacy and Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Hemodialysis Patients with Chronic Heart Failure: A Retrospective Study at a Single Center.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carla PaoliniDivision of Cardiology, West Vicenza General Hospitals, Arzignano-Vicenza, Italy.
Giacomo MugnaiDivision of Cardiology, West Vicenza General Hospitals, Arzignano-Vicenza, Italy.
Chiara Dalla ValleDivision of Cardiology, West Vicenza General Hospitals, Arzignano-Vicenza, Italy.
Andrea VolpianaDivision of Cardiology, West Vicenza General Hospitals, Arzignano-Vicenza, Italy.
Alessandra FerragliaDivision of Cardiology, West Vicenza General Hospitals, Arzignano-Vicenza, Italy.
Anna Chiara FrigoBiostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Claudio BilatoDivision of Cardiology, West Vicenza General Hospitals, Arzignano-Vicenza, Italy.
International Renal Research Institute of Vicenza · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCompared to angiotensin inhibition, angiotensin-neprilysin "blockade" improves mortality and reduces hospitalizations in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (EF). Sacubitril/valsartan is known to influence left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling with systolic function improvement, although underlying mechanisms remain partially unclear. Our objectives were to evaluate whether sacubitril/valsartan promotes LV remodeling and improves LV ejection fraction (LVEF) (above the 35% threshold by echocardiographic evaluation) and to identify predictors of reverse remodeling in a real-world setting.

methodsNew York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-III patients with EF ≤ 35% were consecutively enrolled. All patients were on optimal medical therapy on the initiation of sacubitril/valsartan therapy. Full clinical and multi-parametric echocardiographic evaluation, electrocardiogram, and laboratory tests were performed at baseline and after 3, 6, 12, and 24 months.

resultsIn total, 69 patients were recruited from July 2016 to August 2018. Reverse remodeling was observed in 57.7% (30/52) of patients, occurring within 3, 6, 12, and 24 months in 2, 11, 13, and 4 patients, respectively. Twenty-four (46%) patients showed LVEF improvement above the threshold of 35% during follow-up, occurring in 1, 10, 9, and 4 patients within 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Primitive dilated cardiomyopathy and female gender were identified as significant predictors of reverse remodeling. NYHA class was improved in both remodeling and non-remodeling patients.

conclusionSacubitril/valsartan promotes favorable cardiac remodeling and significantly improves LVEF in a significant proportion of HF patients within 24 months, both in NYHA class II and III patients with HF.

Indexed as

ACEi, Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitorsARBs, Angiotensin II receptor blockersARNI, Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitorCI, Confidence intervalCRT, Cardiac resynchronization therapyESC, European Society of CardiologyGFR, Glomerular filtration rateHeart failureHF, Heart failureHFrEF, Heart failure with reduced ejection fractionICD, Implantable cardioverter-defibrillatorLA, Left atriumLVEF, Left ventricular ejection fractionLV, Left ventricularMR, Mitral regurgitationNYHA, New York Heart AssociationOMT, Optimal medical therapyOR, Odds ratioRAAS, Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone systemReverse remodelingSacubitril/valsartan

Identifiers

PMID34179333
PMCPMC8213880
OpenAlexW3167885816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.