Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34178958›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2021

Early Deformation of Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes Following Surgical Implantation: Intracranial, Brain, and Electrode Mechanics.

Frédéric Chapelle, Lucie Manciet, Bruno Pereira, Anna Sontheimer, Jérôme Coste, Youssef El Ouadih, Ruxandra Cimpeanu, Dimitri Gouot, Yuri Lapusta, Béatrice Claise and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Frédéric ChapelleSigma Clermont, Clermont Auvergne Institut National Polytechnique, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Lucie MancietSigma Clermont, Clermont Auvergne Institut National Polytechnique, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Bruno PereiraDirection de la Recherche Clinique et de l'Innovation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Anna SontheimerUniversité Clermont Auvergne, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Clermont Auvergne Institut National Polytechnique, Institut Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Jérôme CosteUniversité Clermont Auvergne, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Clermont Auvergne Institut National Polytechnique, Institut Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Youssef El OuadihUniversité Clermont Auvergne, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Clermont Auvergne Institut National Polytechnique, Institut Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Ruxandra CimpeanuService de Neurochirurgie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Dimitri GouotSigma Clermont, Clermont Auvergne Institut National Polytechnique, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Yuri LapustaSigma Clermont, Clermont Auvergne Institut National Polytechnique, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Béatrice ClaiseUniversité Clermont Auvergne, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Clermont Auvergne Institut National Polytechnique, Institut Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Valérie SautouCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Clermont Auvergne Institut National Polytechnique, Institut de Chimie de Clermont-Ferrand, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Yassine BouattourCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Clermont Auvergne Institut National Polytechnique, Institut de Chimie de Clermont-Ferrand, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Ana MarquesUniversité Clermont Auvergne, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Clermont Auvergne Institut National Polytechnique, Institut Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Adrien WohrerUniversité Clermont Auvergne, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Clermont Auvergne Institut National Polytechnique, Institut Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Jean-Jacques LemaireUniversité Clermont Auvergne, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Clermont Auvergne Institut National Polytechnique, Institut Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Sigma Clermont · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand · FRInstitut Pascal · FRClermont Université · FRUniversité Clermont Auvergne · FRInstitut de Chimie de Clermont-Ferrand · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough deep brain stimulation is nowadays performed worldwide, the biomechanical aspects of electrode implantation received little attention, mainly as physicians focused on the medical aspects, such as the optimal indication of the surgical procedure, the positive and adverse effects, and the long-term follow-up. We aimed to describe electrode deformations and brain shift immediately after implantation, as it may highlight our comprehension of intracranial and intracerebral mechanics. MATERIALS AND

methodsSixty electrodes of 30 patients suffering from severe symptoms of Parkinson's disease and essential tremor were studied. They consisted of 30 non-directional electrodes and 30 directional electrodes, implanted 42 times in the subthalamus and 18 times in the ventrolateral thalamus. We computed the x (transversal), y (anteroposterior), z (depth), torsion, and curvature deformations, along the electrodes from the entrance point in the braincase. The electrodes were modelized from the immediate postoperative CT scan using automatic voxel thresholding segmentation, manual subtraction of artifacts, and automatic skeletonization. The deformation parameters were computed from the curve of electrodes using a third-order polynomial regression. We studied these deformations according to the type of electrodes, the clinical parameters, the surgical-related accuracy, the brain shift, the hemisphere and three tissue layers, the gyration layer, the white matter stem layer, and the deep brain layer (type I error set at 5%).

resultsWe found that the implanted first hemisphere coupled to the brain shift and the stiffness of the type of electrode impacted on the electrode deformations. The deformations were also different according to the tissue layers, to the electrode type, and to the first-hemisphere-brain-shift effect.

conclusionOur findings provide information on the intracranial and brain biomechanics and should help further developments on intracerebral electrode design and surgical issues.

Indexed as

biomechanicsbrainDBSdeformationelectrode

Identifiers

PMID34178958
PMCPMC8226181
OpenAlexW3173066075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.