Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34178951›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2021

Classification of 41 Hand and Wrist Movements via Surface Electromyogram Using Deep Neural Network.

Panyawut Sri-Iesaranusorn, Attawit Chaiyaroj, Chatchai Buekban, Songphon Dumnin, Ronachai Pongthornseri, Chusak Thanawattano, Decho Surangsrirat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A Circular, Wireless Surface-Electromyography Array.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Panyawut Sri-IesaranusornMathematical Informatics, Information Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Nara, Japan.
Attawit ChaiyarojAssistive Technology and Medical Devices Research Center, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Chatchai BuekbanAssistive Technology and Medical Devices Research Center, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Songphon DumninAssistive Technology and Medical Devices Research Center, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Ronachai PongthornseriAssistive Technology and Medical Devices Research Center, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Chusak ThanawattanoAssistive Technology and Medical Devices Research Center, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Decho SurangsriratAssistive Technology and Medical Devices Research Center, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Pathum Thani, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surface electromyography (sEMG) is a non-invasive and straightforward way to allow the user to actively control the prosthesis. However, results reported by previous studies on using sEMG for hand and wrist movement classification vary by a large margin, due to several factors including but not limited to the number of classes and the acquisition protocol. The objective of this paper is to investigate the deep neural network approach on the classification of 41 hand and wrist movements based on the sEMG signal. The proposed models were trained and evaluated using the publicly available database from the Ninapro project, one of the largest public sEMG databases for advanced hand myoelectric prosthetics. Two datasets, DB5 with a low-cost 16 channels and 200 Hz sampling rate setup and DB7 with 12 channels and 2 kHz sampling rate setup, were used for this study. Our approach achieved an overall accuracy of 93.87 ± 1.49 and 91.69 ± 4.68% with a balanced accuracy of 84.00 ± 3.40 and 84.66 ± 4.78% for DB5 and DB7, respectively. We also observed a performance gain when considering only a subset of the movements, namely the six main hand movements based on six prehensile patterns from the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP), a clinically validated hand functional assessment protocol. Classification on only the SHAP movements in DB5 attained an overall accuracy of 98.82 ± 0.58% with a balanced accuracy of 94.48 ± 2.55%. With the same set of movements, our model also achieved an overall accuracy of 99.00% with a balanced accuracy of 91.27% on data from one of the amputee participants in DB7. These results suggest that with more data on the amputee subjects, our proposal could be a promising approach for controlling versatile prosthetic hands with a wide range of predefined hand and wrist movements.

Indexed as

deep neural networkhand movement classificationNinapro databaseprosthetic handsurface electromyogram

Identifiers

PMID34178951
PMCPMC8220079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.