Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34178906›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2021

Kristina N Adachi, Karin Nielsen-Saines, Jeffrey D Klausner

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Anti-International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Prevalence ofInternational journal of women's health · 2026
    Article
  8. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Identifying the Impact ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Microorganisms · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kristina N AdachiDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Karin Nielsen-SainesDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Jeffrey D KlausnerDivision of Disease Prevention, Policy and Global Health, Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
University of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Chlamydia InfectionsPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPremature BirthChlamydia trachomatisFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy Outcomeadverse pregnancy outcomesChlamydia trachomatisinfant outcomespregnancysexually transmitted infections

Identifiers

PMID34178906
PMCPMC8222807
OpenAlexW3168394525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.