Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34178655›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Subtype-Based Analysis of Cell-in-Cell Structures in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Yuqi Wang, Zubiao Niu, Lulin Zhou, Yongan Zhou, Qunfeng Ma, Yichao Zhu, Mengzhe Liu, Yinan Shi, Yanhong Tai, Qiuju Shao and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Entosis in Health and Disease.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Homotypic Entosis as a Potential Novel Diagnostic Marker in Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Yuqi WangCollege of Life Science and Bioengineering, School of Science, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China.
Zubiao NiuResearch Unit of Cell Death Mechanism, Institute of Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China.
Lulin ZhouResearch Unit of Cell Death Mechanism, Institute of Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China.
Yongan ZhouDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Qunfeng MaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yichao ZhuResearch Unit of Cell Death Mechanism, Institute of Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China.
Mengzhe LiuCollege of Life Science and Bioengineering, School of Science, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China.
Yinan ShiCollege of Life Science and Bioengineering, School of Science, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China.
Yanhong TaiDepartment of Pathology, The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qiuju ShaoDepartment of Radiotherapy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Jianlin GeCollege of Life Science and Bioengineering, School of Science, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China.
Jilei HuaCollege of Life Science and Bioengineering, School of Science, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China.
Lihua GaoResearch Unit of Cell Death Mechanism, Institute of Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China.
Hongyan HuangDepartment of Oncology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hong JiangCollege of Life Science and Bioengineering, School of Science, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China.
Qiang SunResearch Unit of Cell Death Mechanism, Institute of Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-in-cell (CIC) structures are defined as the special structures with one or more cells enclosed inside another one. Increasing data indicated that CIC structures were functional surrogates of complicated cell behaviors and prognosis predictor in heterogeneous cancers. However, the CIC structure profiling and its prognostic value have not been reported in human esophageal squamous cell Carcinoma (ESCC). We conducted the analysis of subtyped CIC-based profiling in ESCC using "epithelium-macrophage-leukocyte" (EML) multiplex staining and examined the prognostic value of CIC structure profiling through Kaplan-Meier plotting and Cox regression model. Totally, five CIC structure subtypes were identified in ESCC tissue and the majority of them was homotypic CIC (hoCIC) with tumor cells inside tumor cells (TiT). By univariate and multivariate analyses, TiT was shown to be an independent prognostic factor for resectable ESCC, and patients with higher density of TiT tended to have longer post-operational survival time. Furthermore, in subpopulation analysis stratified by TNM stage, high TiT density was associated with longer overall survival (OS) in patients of TNM stages III and IV as compared with patients with low TiT density (mean OS: 51

Indexed as

cell-in-cell structuresEML stainingentosisesophageal squamous cell carcinomafunctional pathologymultiplex stainingprognosissubtype

Identifiers

PMID34178655
PMCPMC8231019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.