Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34178630›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Real-World Data on Apatinib Efficacy - Results of a Retrospective Study in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Pretreated With Multiline Treatment.

Zhaoyun Liu, Jing Shan, Qian Yu, Xinzhao Wang, Xiang Song, Fukai Wang, Chao Li, Zhiyong Yu, Jinming Yu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhaoyun LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Jing ShanShandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Qian YuDepartment of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Xinzhao WangShandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Xiang SongShandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Fukai WangShandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Chao LiShandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Zhiyong YuShandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Jinming YuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Shandong First Medical University · CNShandong Tumor Hospital · CNCleveland Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe NCCN guidelines recommend that the addition of bevacizumab should be considered in metastatic breast cancers in some circumstances, but there are no recommendations for the similar antiangiogenic drug apatinib. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of apatinib in metastatic breast cancer patients pretreated with multiline treatment in a real-world setting. MATERIALS AND

methodsMetastatic breast cancer patients pretreated with multiline treatment who had apatinib treatment initiated from September 2015 to August 2019 at Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute were included. The primary endpoints included PFS and OS, and the secondary endpoint was treatment-related toxicity.

resultsA total of 66 patients with metastatic breast cancer received apatinib treatment after failure of multiline chemotherapy in this study. The median PFS and OS of all 66 patients were 6.0 months and 10.0 months, respectively. The clinical beneficial rate was 40.9%. All patients tolerated treatment well, and no patients died of toxicity. The common toxicities of apatinib were hand and foot syndrome, secondary hypertension and fatigue events. The number of prior chemotherapy regimens was significantly associated with DFS and OS. Capecitabine may be a better choice for combination with a longer median OS of 19 months, while apatinib combined with other drugs was 9 months, and the apatinib monotherapy was 10 months.

conclusionApatinib produced moderate efficacy in metastatic breast cancer patients pretreated with multiline treatment with no significant treatment-related adverse events. Apatinib might be a choice for women as a maintenance salvage therapy following multiline chemotherapy failure.

Indexed as

apatinibbreast cancerefficacymetastaticsafety

Identifiers

PMID34178630
PMCPMC8224527
OpenAlexW3166315795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.