Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34178616›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Magnetic Resonance-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Liver Tumors: Initial Clinical Experience and Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Fabian Weykamp, Philipp Hoegen, Sebastian Klüter, C Katharina Spindeldreier, Laila König, Katharina Seidensaal, Sebastian Regnery, Jakob Liermann, Carolin Rippke, Stefan A Koerber and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Surrogate gating strategies for the Elekta Unity MR-Linac gating system.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Patient expectation and experience of MR-guided radiotherapy using a 1.5T MR-Linac.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Fabian WeykampDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Philipp HoegenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sebastian KlüterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
C Katharina SpindeldreierDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Laila KönigDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Katharina SeidensaalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sebastian RegneryDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jakob LiermannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Carolin RippkeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Stefan A KoerberDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Carolin BucheleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jürgen DebusDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Juliane Hörner-RieberDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberger Institut für Radioonkologie · DENational Center for Tumor Diseases · DEHeidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PURPOSE/

objectiveStereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a valid treatment alternative for non-resectable liver metastases or hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC). Magnetic resonance (MR) guided SBRT has a high potential of further improving treatment quality, allowing for higher, tumoricidal irradiation doses whilst simultaneously sparing organs at risk. However, data on treatment outcome and patient acceptance is still limited. MATERIAL/

methodsWe performed a subgroup analysis of an ongoing prospective observational study comprising patients with liver metastases or HCC. Patients were treated with ablative MR-guided SBRT at the MRIdian Linac in the Department of Radiation Oncology at Heidelberg University Hospital between January 2019 and February 2020. Local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. An in-house designed patient-reported outcome questionnaire was used to measure patients' experience with the MR-Linac treatment. Toxicity was evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v. 5.0).

resultsTwenty patients (with n = 18 metastases; n = 2 HCC) received MR-guided SBRT for in total 26 malignant liver lesions. Median biologically effective dose (BED at α/β = 10) was 105.0 Gy (range: 67.2-112.5 Gy) and median planning target volume was 57.20 ml (range: 17.4-445.0 ml). Median treatment time was 39.0 min (range: 26.0-67.0 min). At 1-year, LC was 88.1% and OS was 84.0%. Grade I° gastrointestinal toxicity °occurred in 30.0% and grade II° in 5.0% of the patients with no grade III° or higher toxicity. Overall treatment experience was rated positively, with items scoring MR-Linac staff's performance and items concerning the breath hold process being among the top positively rated elements. Worst scored items were treatment duration, positioning and low temperature.

conclusionMR-guided SBRT of liver tumors is a well-tolerated and well-accepted treatment modality. Initial results are promising with excellent local control and only mildest toxicity. However, prospective studies are warranted to truly assess the potential of MR-guided liver SBRT and to identify which patients profit most from this new versatile technology.

Indexed as

hepatocellular carcinomaliver metastasesMR-guidedpatient reported outcomesstereotactic body radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID34178616
PMCPMC8219972
OpenAlexW3167405039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.