Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34178569›Full record

ArticleArabian journal for science and engineering2021

COBERT: COVID-19 Question Answering System Using BERT.

Jafar A Alzubi, Rachna Jain, Anubhav Singh, Pritee Parwekar, Meenu Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arabian journal for science and engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Question answering systems for health professionals at the point of care-a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jafar A AlzubiAl-Balqa Applied University, Salt, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0001-6724-1421
Rachna JainBharati Vidyapeeth's College of Engineering, New Delhi, India.
Anubhav SinghBharati Vidyapeeth's College of Engineering, New Delhi, India.
Pritee ParwekarSRM Institute of Science and Technology, NCR Campus, Ghaziabad, India.
Meenu GuptaChandigarh University, Ajitgarh, Punjab India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the current situation of worldwide pandemic COVID-19, which has infected 62.5 Million people and caused nearly 1.46 Million deaths worldwide as of Nov 2020. The profoundly powerful and quickly advancing circumstance with COVID-19 has made it hard to get precise, on-request latest data with respect to the virus. Especially, the frontline workers of the battle medical services experts, policymakers, clinical scientists, and so on will require expert specific methods to stay aware of this literature for getting scientific knowledge of the latest research findings. The risks are most certainly not trivial, as decisions made on fallacious, answers may endanger trust or general well being and security of the public. But, with thousands of research papers being dispensed on the topic, making it more difficult to keep track of the latest research. Taking these challenges into account we have proposed COBERT: a retriever-reader dual algorithmic system that answers the complex queries by searching a document of 59K corona virus-related literature made accessible through the Coronavirus Open Research Dataset Challenge (CORD-19). The retriever is composed of a TF-IDF vectorizer capturing the top 500 documents with optimal scores. The reader which is pre-trained Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) on SQuAD 1.1 dev dataset built on top of the HuggingFace BERT transformers, refines the sentences from the filtered documents, which are then passed into ranker which compares the logits scores to produce a short answer, title of the paper and source article of extraction. The proposed DistilBERT version has outperformed previous pre-trained models obtaining an Exact Match(EM)/F1 score of 80.6/87.3 respectively.

Indexed as

BERTCDQACORD-19Cosine-similarityCOVID-19DistilBERTHuggingFaceQuestion answeringSQuADTF-IDF

Identifiers

PMID34178569
PMCPMC8220121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.