Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34177841›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2021

Short-Term Effect in Soil Microbial Community of Two Strategies of Recovering Degraded Area in Brazilian Savanna: A Pilot Case Study.

Priscila Jane Romano Gonçalves Selari, Luiz Ricardo Olchanheski, Almir José Ferreira, Tiago do Prado Paim, Guido Calgaro Junior, Flavio Lopes Claudio, Estenio Moreira Alves, Darliane de Castro Santos, Welington Luiz Araújo, Fabiano Guimarães Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Priscila Jane Romano Gonçalves SelariLaboratory of Microbiology, Department of Biology, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Goiano (Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology Goiano), Ceres, Brazil.
Luiz Ricardo OlchanheskiLaboratory of Microbiology, Department of Structural and Molecular Biology and Genetics, State University of Ponta Grossa (UEPG), Ponta Grossa, Brazil.
Almir José FerreiraLaboratory of Molecular Biology and Microbial Ecology, Department of Microbiology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Tiago do Prado PaimLaboratory of Education in Agriculture Production, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Goiano (Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology Goiano), Iporá, Brazil.
Guido Calgaro JuniorLaboratory of Education in Agriculture Production, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Goiano (Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology Goiano), Iporá, Brazil.
Flavio Lopes ClaudioLaboratory of Education in Agriculture Production, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Goiano (Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology Goiano), Iporá, Brazil.
Estenio Moreira AlvesLaboratory of Education in Agriculture Production, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Goiano (Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology Goiano), Iporá, Brazil.
Darliane de Castro SantosLaboratory of Agricultural Chemistry, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Goiano (Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology Goiano), Rio Verde, Brazil.
Welington Luiz AraújoLaboratory of Molecular Biology and Microbial Ecology, Department of Microbiology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Fabiano Guimarães SilvaLaboratory of Plant Tissue and Culture, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Goiano (Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology Goiano), Rio Verde, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Brazilian Cerrado is a highland tropical savanna considered a biodiversity hotspot with many endemic species of plants and animals. Over the years, most of the native areas of this biome became arable areas, and with inadequate management, some are nowadays at varying levels of degradation stage. Crop-livestock integrated systems (CLIS) are one option for the recovery of areas in degradation, improving the physicochemical and biological characteristics of the soil while increasing income and mitigating risks due to product diversification. Little is known about the effect of CLIS on the soil microbial community. Therefore, we perform this pilot case study to support further research on recovering degraded areas. The bacterial and fungal soil communities in the area with CLIS were compared to an area under moderate recovery (low-input recovering - LI) and native savanna (NS) area. Bacterial and fungal communities were investigated by 16S and ITS rRNA gene sequencing (deep rRNA sequencing). Ktedonobacteraceae and AD3 families were found predominantly in LI, confirming the relationship of the members of the Chloroflexi phylum in challenging environmental conditions, which can be evidenced in LI. The CLIS soil presented 63 exclusive bacterial families that were not found in LI or NS and presented a higher bacterial richness, which can be related to good land management. The NS area shared 21 and 6 families with CLIS and LI, respectively, suggesting that the intervention method used in the analyzed period brings microbial diversity closer to the conditions of the native area, demonstrating a trend of approximation between NS and CLIS even in the short term. The most abundant fungal phylum in NS treatment was Basidiomycota and Mucoromycota, whereas Ascomycota predominated in CLIS and LI. The fungal community needs more time to recover and to approximate from the native area than the bacterial community. However, according to the analysis of bacteria, the CLIS area behaved differently from the LI area, showing that this treatment induces a faster response to the increase in species richness, tending to more accelerated recovery. Results obtained herein encourage CLIS as a sustainable alternative for recovery and production in degraded areas.

Indexed as

crop-livestock integrated systemland usemetagenomicssoil microbiomesustainability

Identifiers

PMID34177841
PMCPMC8221397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.