Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34177773›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2021

Contribution of CT-Scan Analysis by Artificial Intelligence to the Clinical Care of TBI Patients.

Clément Brossard, Benjamin Lemasson, Arnaud Attyé, Jules-Arnaud de Busschère, Jean-François Payen, Emmanuel L Barbier, Jules Grèze, Pierre Bouzat

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Clément BrossardUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, CHU Grenoble Alpes, U1216, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France.
Benjamin LemassonUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, CHU Grenoble Alpes, U1216, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France.
Arnaud AttyéUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, CHU Grenoble Alpes, U1216, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France.
Jules-Arnaud de BusschèreUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, CHU Grenoble Alpes, U1216, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France.
Jean-François PayenUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, CHU Grenoble Alpes, U1216, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France.
Emmanuel L BarbierUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, CHU Grenoble Alpes, U1216, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France.
Jules GrèzeUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, CHU Grenoble Alpes, U1216, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France.
Pierre BouzatUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, CHU Grenoble Alpes, U1216, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gold standard to diagnose intracerebral lesions after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is computed tomography (CT) scan, and due to its accessibility and improved quality of images, the global burden of CT scan for TBI patients is increasing. The recent developments of automated determination of traumatic brain lesions and medical-decision process using artificial intelligence (AI) represent opportunities to help clinicians in screening more patients, identifying the nature and volume of lesions and estimating the patient outcome. This short review will summarize what is ongoing with the use of AI and CT scan for patients with TBI.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclassificationcomputed tomographyreviewsegmentationtraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID34177773
PMCPMC8222716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.