Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34177725›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021

Perceptual and Interoceptive Strength Norms for 270 French Words.

Aurélie Miceli, Erika Wauthia, Laurent Lefebvre, Laurence Ris, Isabelle Simoes Loureiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Review of Studies Supporting Metaphorical Embodiment.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aurélie MiceliCognitive Psychology and Neuropsychology Department, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Mons, Mons, Belgium.
Erika WauthiaCognitive Psychology and Neuropsychology Department, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Mons, Mons, Belgium.
Laurent LefebvreCognitive Psychology and Neuropsychology Department, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Mons, Mons, Belgium.
Laurence RisInstitute of Health Sciences and Technologies, University of Mons, Mons, Belgium.
Isabelle Simoes LoureiroCognitive Psychology and Neuropsychology Department, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Mons, Mons, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perceptual experience through the five modalities (i.e., vision, hearing, touch, taste, and smell) has demonstrated its key role in semantics. Researchers also highlighted the role of interoceptive information in the grounded representation of concepts. However, to this day, there is no available data across these modalities in the French language. Therefore, the aim of this study was to circumvent this caveat. Participants aged between 18 and 50 completed an online survey in which we recorded scores of perceptual strength (PS), interoceptive information, imageability, concreteness, conceptual familiarity, and age of acquisition of 270 words of the French language. We also analysed the relationships between perceptual modalities and psycholinguistic variables. Results showed that vast majority of concepts were visually-dominant. Correlation analyses revealed that the five PS variables were strongly correlated with imageability, concreteness, and conceptual familiarity and highlight that PS variables index one aspect of the semantic representations of a word. On the other hand, high interoceptive scores were highlighted only for the less imageable and less concrete words, emphasizing their importance for the grounding of abstract concepts. Future research could use these norms in the investigation of the role of perceptual experience in the representation of concepts and their impact on word processing.

Indexed as

interoception conceptualizationnormsperceptual strengthpsycholinguistic variablessemantic

Identifiers

PMID34177725
PMCPMC8226098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.