Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34177713›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021

Identifying Resilience Factors of Distress and Paranoia During the COVID-19 Outbreak in Five Countries.

Martin Jensen Mækelæ, Niv Reggev, Renata P Defelipe, Natalia Dutra, Ricardo M Tamayo, Kristoffer Klevjer, Gerit Pfuhl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Procrastination during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Martin Jensen MækelæDepartment of Psychology, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Niv ReggevDepartment of Psychology, Zlotowski Center for Neuroscience, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel.
Renata P DefelipeInstituto de Psicologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Natalia DutraEvolution of Human Behavior Laboratory, Department of Physiology and Behavior, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Ricardo M TamayoDepartamento de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Kristoffer KlevjerDepartment of Psychology, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Gerit PfuhlDepartment of Psychology, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
UiT The Arctic University of Norway · NOBen-Gurion University of the Negev · ILUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BRUniversidad Nacional de Colombia · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic outbreak has affected all countries with more than 100 million confirmed cases and over 2.1 million casualties by the end of January 2021 worldwide. A prolonged pandemic can harm global levels of optimism, regularity, and sense of meaning and belonging, yielding adverse effects on individuals' mental health as represented by worry, paranoia, and distress. Here we studied resilience, a successful adaptation despite risk and adversity, in five countries: Brazil, Colombia, Germany, Israel, and Norway. In April 2020, over 2,500 participants were recruited for an observational study measuring protective and obstructive factors for distress and paranoia. More than 800 of these participants also completed a follow-up study in July. We found that thriving, keeping a regular schedule, engaging in physical exercise and less procrastination served as factors protecting against distress and paranoia. Risk factors were financial worries and a negative mindset, e.g., feeling a lack of control. Longitudinally, we found no increase in distress or paranoia despite an increase in expectation of how long the outbreak and the restrictions will last, suggesting respondents engaged in healthy coping and adapting their lives to the new circumstances. Altogether, our data suggest that humans adapt even to prolonged stressful events. Our data further highlight several protective factors that policymakers should leverage when considering stress-reducing policies.

Indexed as

coping behaviormental healthpandemic (COVID-19)protective factorthriving

Identifiers

PMID34177713
PMCPMC8222673
OpenAlexW3170883897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.