Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34177659›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2021

Estimating the Prevalence and Genetic Risk Mechanisms of ARFID in a Large Autism Cohort.

Tanner Koomar, Taylor R Thomas, Natalie R Pottschmidt, Michael Lutter, Jacob J Michaelson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tanner KoomarDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States.
Taylor R ThomasDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States.
Natalie R PottschmidtDepartment of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, United States.
Michael LutterEating Recovery Center of San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States.
Jacob J MichaelsonDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States.
University of Iowa · USPennsylvania State University · USThe Recovery Center · US

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING PROGRAM IN GENETICST32GM008629 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI EBERL, DANIEL F · 1997 to 2021
$4.1M
Understanding the biology of language impairment through whole genome sequencingR01DC014489 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI MICHAELSON, JACOB JAMES · 2016 to 2020
$3.1M
Estimating the impact of genetic variants on the brain in space and timeR01MH105527 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI MICHAELSON, JACOB JAMES · 2015 to 2017
$1.2M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014489NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008629NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH105527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study is the first genetically-informed investigation of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), an eating disorder that profoundly impacts quality of life for those affected. ARFID is highly comorbid with autism, and we provide the first estimate of its prevalence in a large and phenotypically diverse autism cohort (a subsample of the SPARK study,

Indexed as

ARFIDautismeating disordersgeneticsheritability

Identifiers

PMID34177659
PMCPMC8221394
OpenAlexW3169410997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.