ArticleCase reports in ophthalmology
Postoperative Macular Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy: A Case Series and Literature Review.
Article in Case reports in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- PVR update: pathophysiology and clinical management.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Experimental Models to Study Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Premacular membranes developing following pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) can cause significant anatomical and functional deficits to the macula. Recent reports showed that postoperative premacular membranes are a localized presentation of macular proliferative vitreoretinopathy (mPVR). Here, we report retrospectively a case series of 5 patients with severe mPVR which developed following uneventful PPV and were followed up to 32 months in the Department of Ophthalmology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, between October 2016 and February 2020. All patients underwent primary repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) before mPVR developed. Mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at presentation was 20/76 Snellen (0.58 LogMAR). Median duration of the retinal detachment time until surgery was 1.5 days (range 1-21 days). Mean interval time from last normal follow-up exam to diagnosis of mPVR was 19 days (range 10-28). BCVA dropped from a mean of 20/38 Snellen (0.28 LogMAR) prior to mPVR development to 20/166 Snellen (0.92 LogMAR) following its development, recovering to 20/57 Snellen (0.45 LogMAR) after peeling of membranes. Mean central macular thickness measured by optical coherence tomography decreased from 711 to 354 μm postsurgery. In conclusion, short-term mPVR is a different entity from macular pucker in terms of rapid development, structural distortion, and visual compromise. Surgical treatment significantly restores macular function and anatomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.