ArticleCase reports in oncology
Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis of Metastatic Primary Prostate Cancer.
Article in Case reports in oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) is an uncommon complication of cancer in which the disease metastasizes to the meninges; it is estimated that this occurs in 5% of cancer patients and is most often terminal. LC has a median survival time of approximately 15.7 weeks [Leal et al., Curr Cancer Ther Rev. 2011;7(4):319-27]. Furthermore, metastasis from the prostate is exceptionally rare with only a few cases described in medical literature. Until recently, leptomeningeal disruption was very rare and cerebral involvement was irrelevant [Bubendorf et al., Hum Pathol. 2000;31(5):578-83; Schaller et al., Br J Cancer. 2000;77(12):2386-9]. With improved imaging, diagnostic modalities, and treatment with therapies that do not cross the blood-brain barrier, the incidence of LC has been on the rise [Batool and Kasi, StatPearls, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499862/]. Diagnosis previously relied on biopsy, supported by lumbar puncture findings. We submit a case demonstrating progressive and consistent evidence of LC found on imaging, justifying its acceptance as a diagnostic modality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.