Trekking Poles to Aid Multiple Sclerosis Walking Impairment: An Exploratory Comparison of the Effects of Assistive Devices on Psychosocial Impact and Walking.

backgroundWalking dysfunction is reported by two-thirds of persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). Assistive devices are frequently recommended to improve walking; however, it is uncommon to consider their psychosocial impact, although many users abandon their assistive devices. The psychosocial impact, walking, balance, and fatigue associated with three assistive devices were compared to guide clinical decision making.

methodsTwenty-five persons with MS (median Expanded Disability Status Scale score, 4.0; range, 2.5-6.0) who reported walking difficulty were trained in the use of three assistive devices-a single-point cane (SPC), a four-point cane (FPC), and a trekking pole (TP)-at 1- to 2-week intervals, then used the assistive device for their usual activities. Outcome measures included the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS), the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), walking speed, cadence, stride length, stride time, the 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12), the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale, the 5-item Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS-5), and a visual analogue scale of fatigue (VAS-F).

resultsThe SPC and TP were more positive in the PIADS adaptability, competence, and self-esteem subscales. The SPC and TP resulted in higher 6MWT, walking speed, cadence, stride length, stride time, and MSWS-12 scores compared with the FPC. No differences were found in ABC scale, MFIS-5, or VAS-F scores.

conclusionsParticipants reported more positive psychosocial impact, and walked faster and with higher quality, with the SPC and TP than with the FPC. Clinicians should consider suggesting an SPC or TP to patients who may benefit from assistive device use and for whom psychosocial impact is an important consideration.