ArticleJournal of medical biochemistry2021
Verification of quantitative analytical methods in medical laboratories.
Article in Journal of medical biochemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative measurement of anti-interferon-gamma autoantibodies for routine laboratory implementation.iScience · 2026Article
- Performance Evaluation of Automated Urit 5160 Haematology Analyser at the Bamenda Regional Hospital, Cameroon.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2026Review
- Emerging Quantitative Targeted Metabolomics Approaches for Future Inborn Errors of Metabolism Screening.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- High prevalence of class 1 integron, biofilm formation, and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Escherichia coli isolated from cattle, water, and soil in Bangladesh.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Article
- The Verification Process of a POC Blood Gas Analyser-The Nova Stat Profile Primer Plus Analyser.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2025Article
- Reducing the need for repeating urine drug testing with the gray zone determined by the measurement uncertainty.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2023Article
- Applied Clinical Tandem Mass Spectrometry-Based Quantification Methods for Lipid-Derived Biomarkers, Steroids and Cannabinoids: Fit-for-Purpose Validation Methods.Biomolecules · 2023Article
- Virtual assessment, training, and evaluation of clinical laboratory technologists amidst peak Covid-19 pandemic: An observational study.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2022Article
- Antiphospholipid antibodies in healthy Serbian middle-aged subjects: Preliminary data.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2022Article
- Indirect estimation of reference intervals for thyroid parameters using advia centaur XP analyzer.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2022Article
- Error evaluation in the laboratory testing process and laboratory information systems.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2022Article
- Interferograms plotted with reference change value (RCV) may facilitate the management of hemolyzed samples.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2022Article
- Performance evaluation of CA242 by flow fluorescence assay.Medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlobally, all medical laboratories seeking accreditation should meet international quality standards to perform certain specific tests. Quality management program provides disciplines targeted to ensure that quality standards have been implemented by a laboratory in order to generate correct results. The hallmark of the accreditation process is method verification and quality assurance. Before introducing a new method in your laboratory, it is important to assess certain performance characteristics that reflect the concept of method verification.
methodsIn this review, we illustrated how to verify the performance characteristics of a new method according to the recent guidelines. It includes an assessment of precision, trueness, analytical sensitivity, detection limits, analytical specificity, interference, measuring range, linearity, and measurement uncertainty.
conclusionsAlthough the presence of several updated guidelines used to determine the performance characteristics of new methods in clinical chemistry laboratories, the real practice raised several concerns with the application of these guidelines which in need for further consideration in the upcoming updates of these guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.