Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34177249›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in neurology2021

Neurocritical Care of the Pregnant Patient.

Deepa Malaiyandi, Elysia James, Lindsay Peglar, Nurose Karim, Nicholas Henkel, Kristin Guilliams

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Deepa MalaiyandiDepartment of Neurology, Division of Neurocritical Care, University of Toledo College of Medicine, Toledo, OH USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9113-6127
Elysia JamesDepartment of Neurology, Division of Neurocritical Care, University of Toledo College of Medicine, Toledo, OH USA.
Lindsay PeglarDepartment of Neurology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO USA.
Nurose KarimDepartment of Neurology, Division of Neurocritical Care, University of Toledo College of Medicine, Toledo, OH USA.
Nicholas HenkelDepartment of Neurology, Division of Neurocritical Care, University of Toledo College of Medicine, Toledo, OH USA.
Kristin GuilliamsDepartment of Neurology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO USA.
ProMedica Toledo Hospital · USUniversity of Toledo · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo summarize recent changes in management and emerging therapies for pregnant neurocritical care patients. RECENT

findingsDiagnostic and treatment options for managing neurologic emergencies in pregnant patients have expanded with both greater understanding of the effects of imaging modalities and medications on pregnancy and application of standard treatments for non-pregnant patients to pregnant populations. Specifically, this includes cerebrovascular diseases (pregnancy-associated ischemic stroke, pregnancy-associated intracerebral hemorrhage, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis), post-maternal cardiac arrest care, seizures and status epilepticus, myasthenia gravis, and fetal somatic support in maternal death by neurologic criteria. SUMMARY: With the exception of direct abdominal computed tomography (CT), most imaging studies are reasonably safe in pregnancy. When emergent imaging is needed to prevent maternal morbidity or mortality, any CT sequence with or without contrast is appropriate to pursue. Though new safety data on antiplatelets, antihypertensives, thrombolytics, and antiepileptic drugs have increased options for disease management in pregnancy, unfractionated and low-molecular weight heparin remain the safest options for anticoagulation. Early studies on hypothermia, ketamine, and immunomodulating therapies in pregnancy are promising. In myasthenia gravis, new data on adjunct devices may allow more patients to undergo safe vaginal delivery, avoiding cesarean section and the associated risk of crisis. When difficult decisions regarding preterm delivery arise, recent outcome studies can help inform discussion. Lastly, when the feared complication of maternal death by neurologic criteria occurs, fetal somatic support may help to save at least one life.

Indexed as

Acute cerebrovascular disorders in pregnancyMyasthenic crisis in pregnancy, neurocritical care management during pregnancyNeurological emergencies in pregnancyPost-maternal cardiac arrest careStatus epilepticus in pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID34177249
PMCPMC8214980
OpenAlexW3173493018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.