Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34177248›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in neurology2020

Cerebral Edema in Traumatic Brain Injury: a Historical Framework for Current Therapy.

Benjamin E Zusman, Patrick M Kochanek, Ruchira M Jha

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Non-pharmacological interventions for traumatic brain injury.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Weight-Drop Method for Inducing Closed Head Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Edema after CNS Trauma: A Focus on Spinal Cord Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. On Net Water Uptake in Posttraumatic Ischemia Foci.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin E ZusmanUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Patrick M KochanekClinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ruchira M JhaClinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
University of Pittsburgh · USNeurological Surgery · US

Funding

A Translational Evaluation of Sur1-Trpm4 Imaging Endophenotypes and Genetics to Direct Precision Medicine for Cerebral Edema After Traumatic Brain InjuryR01NS115815 · NINDS · ST. JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER · PI JHA, RUCHIRA MENKA · 2021 to 2025
$2.8M
2,3 cAMP in Traumatic Brain InjuryR01NS087978 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JACKSON, EDWIN KERRY, KOCHANEK, PATRICK M · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
Translational assessment of sulfonylurea receptor-1 as a biomarker and therapeutic target for cerebral edema in traumatic brain injuryK23NS101036 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JHA, RUCHIRA MENKA · 2017 to 2021
$944k
NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS101036NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS087978NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS115815
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe purposes of this narrative review are to (1) summarize a contemporary view of cerebral edema pathophysiology, (2) present a synopsis of current management strategies in the context of their historical roots (many of which date back multiple centuries), and (3) discuss contributions of key molecular pathways to overlapping edema endophenotypes. This may facilitate identification of important therapeutic targets. RECENT

findingsCerebral edema and resultant intracranial hypertension are major contributors to morbidity and mortality following traumatic brain injury. Although Starling forces are physical drivers of edema based on differences in intravascular vs extracellular hydrostatic and oncotic pressures, the molecular pathophysiology underlying cerebral edema is complex and remains incompletely understood. Current management protocols are guided by intracranial pressure measurements, an imperfect proxy for cerebral edema. These include decompressive craniectomy, external ventricular drainage, hyperosmolar therapy, hypothermia, and sedation. Results of contemporary clinical trials assessing these treatments are summarized, with an emphasis on the gap between intermediate measures of edema and meaningful clinical outcomes. This is followed by a brief statement summarizing the most recent guidelines from the Brain Trauma Foundation (4th edition). While many molecular mechanisms and networks contributing to cerebral edema after TBI are still being elucidated, we highlight some promising molecular mechanism-based targets based on recent research including SUR1-TRPM4, NKCC1, AQP4, and AVP1. SUMMARY: This review outlines the origins of our understanding of cerebral edema, chronicles the history behind many current treatment approaches, and discusses promising molecular mechanism-based targeted treatments.

Indexed as

AQP4AVP-1Cerebral edemaNKCC1SUR1-TRPM4Traumatic brain injury (TBI)

Identifiers

PMID34177248
PMCPMC8223756
OpenAlexW3009159149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.