Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34177247›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2021

Invasive Hemodynamic and Metabolic Evaluation of HFpEF.

J Emanuel Finet, Erik H Van Iterson, W H Wilson Tang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Exercise cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial dynamic index: A non-invasive imaging marker associated with cardiac dyspnea.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025
    Article
  6. Novel Strategies in Diagnosing Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Comprehensive Literature Review.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J Emanuel FinetSection of Heart Failure and Transplantation Medicine; Robert and Suzanne Tomsich Department of Cardiovascular Medicine; Miller Family Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute; Cleveland Clinic. 9500 Euclid Ave, J3-4, Cleveland, OH 44195.
Erik H Van ItersonSection of Preventive Cardiology and Rehabilitation, Robert and Suzanne Tomsich Department of Cardiovascular Medicine; Miller Family Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute; Cleveland Clinic. 9500 Euclid Ave, J3-4, Cleveland, OH 44195.
W H Wilson TangSection of Heart Failure and Transplantation Medicine; Robert and Suzanne Tomsich Department of Cardiovascular Medicine; Miller Family Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute; Cleveland Clinic. 9500 Euclid Ave, J3-4, Cleveland, OH 44195.
Cleveland Clinic · US

Funding

Diet, Gut Microbiota, and Heart FailureR01HL126827 · NHLBI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI HAZEN, STANLEY L, TANG, WAI HONG WILSON · 2016 to 2019
$3.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL126827
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewHeart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a complex and heterogeneous condition of multiple causes, characterized by a clinical syndrome resulting from elevated left ventricular filling pressures, with an apparently unimpaired left ventricular systolic function. Although HFpEF has been long recognized as a distinct entity with significant morbidity for patients, its diagnosis remains challenging to this day. In recent years, few diagnostic algorithms have been postulated to aid in the identification of this condition. Invasive hemodynamic and metabolic evaluation is often warranted for the conclusive diagnosis and risk stratification of HFpEF, in patients presenting with undifferentiated DOE. RECENT

findingsRest and provoked hemodynamics remain the golden-standard diagnostic tool to unequivocally confirm the diagnosis of both established and incipient HFpEF, respectively. Cycle exercise hemodynamics is the paramount provocative maneuver to unveil this condition. Rapid saline loading does not offer a significant benefit over that of cycle exercise. Vasoactive agents can also uncover and confirm incipient HFpEF disease. The role of metabolic evaluation in patients presenting with idiopathic dyspnea on exertion (DOE) is of unparalleled value for those who have expertise in cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) interpretation; however, the average clinician who focuses solely on oxygen consumption will find it underwhelming. Invasive CPET stands alone as the ultimate diagnostic tool to discriminate between pulmonary, cardiovascular, and skeletal muscle disorders, and their respective contribution to DOE and exercise intolerance. SUMMARY: Several hemodynamic and metabolic parameters have demonstrated not only strong diagnostic value, but also predictive power in HFpEF. Additionally, these diagnostic methods have given rise to several therapeutic interventions that are now part of our clinical armamentarium. Regrettably, due to the heterogeneity and multicausality of HFpEF, none of the targeted interventions have been so far successful in decreasing the mortality burden of this prevalent condition.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET)Dyspnea on Exertion (DOE)Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF)Right Heart Catheterization (RHC)

Identifiers

PMID34177247
PMCPMC8223885
OpenAlexW3148858336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.