ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2021
Effects of trunk anterior tilt and knee joint flexion angle changes on muscle activity in the lower limb muscles.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] We examined the effects of trunk anterior tilt angle (TA) and knee flexion angle (KA) on lower limb muscle activity. [Participants and Methods] Twenty-eight healthy male participants (age, 24.7 ± 4.7 years) performed nine standing tasks with different TA and KA. The participants were instructed to remain still during each task. The nine standing tasks were randomly performed while measurements of muscle activity were obtained for seven muscles: gluteus maximus (GMAX), medial hamstrings (MH), lateral hamstrings (LH), rectus femoris (RF), vastus lateralis (VL), medial gastrocnemius (MG), and soleus (SOL). The activities of these muscles were normalized using isometric grade 3 of the manual muscle testing (isoMMT3). The intra-rater reliability for the mean values of the muscle activities measured with the isoMMT3 (intra-class correlation coefficient with 95% confidence interval) was confirmed using equation ICC (1,3). [Results] GMAX, MH, LH, RF, and MG were affected by both TA and KA, whereas VL was affected by KA, and SOL was affected by TA. [Conclusion] Our findings may facilitate a better understanding of the changes in muscle activity of the lower limb muscles due to differences in TA and KA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.