Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34177106›Full record

ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2021

Relationship of the mobility of the sacroiliac joint with foot plant pressure.

Rebeka Boaventura Guimarães, Cesario Rui Callou Filho, Alex Rey Norberto, Renata Salatini, Juliana Zangirolami-Raimundo, Rodrigo Daminello Raimundo

Open access · diamondAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rebeka Boaventura GuimarãesCentro Universitário Dr. Leão Sampaio UNILEÃO, Brazil.
Cesario Rui Callou FilhoUniversidade de Fortaleza, Brazil.
Alex Rey NorbertoDepartamento de Ginecologia, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.
Renata SalatiniLaboratório de Delineamento de Estudo e Escrita Científica, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC: Avenida Príncipe de Gales, 667, Príncipe de Gales, Santo André, CEP 09060-590, Brazil.
Juliana Zangirolami-RaimundoDepartamento de Ginecologia, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.
Rodrigo Daminello RaimundoLaboratório de Delineamento de Estudo e Escrita Científica, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC: Avenida Príncipe de Gales, 667, Príncipe de Gales, Santo André, CEP 09060-590, Brazil.
Faculdade de Medicina do ABC · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade de Fortaleza · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

[Purpose] To evaluate mobility of the sacroiliac joint and plantar pressure changes. [Participants and Methods] This was an analytical study comprised of 300 participants, using a functional kinetic evaluation involving the test of standing flexion (SFT), the test of Downing, the test of Gillet, and the analysis of baropodometry. [Results] There was an association between mobility of the sacroiliac joint and the standing center of gravity. However, the mobility of this joint was not associated with plantar pressure and the plantar contact area. [Conclusion] These data suggest that sacroiliac mobility is linked to the center of gravity. This connection may precede sacroiliac dysfunction and may help to improve the accuracy of the tests.

Indexed as

Plantar pressureSacroiliac jointSacroiliac mobility

Identifiers

PMID34177106
PMCPMC8219602
OpenAlexW3175470303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.