Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34177035›Full record

ArticleExpert systems2022

Pandemic coronavirus disease (Covid-19): World effects analysis and prediction using machine-learning techniques.

Dimple Tiwari, Bhoopesh Singh Bhati, Fadi Al-Turjman, Bharti Nagpal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Expert systems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Deep fused explainable neural architecture for the automatic recognition of therapeutic medicinal plants.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dimple TiwariAmbedkar Institute of Advanced Communication Technologies and Research, Govt of NCT of Delhi Delhi India.
Bhoopesh Singh BhatiAmbedkar Institute of Advanced Communication Technologies and Research, Govt of NCT of Delhi Delhi India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8476-2798
Fadi Al-TurjmanArtificial Intelligence Engineering Department, Research Center for AI and IoT Near East University Nicosia Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5418-873X
Bharti NagpalAmbedkar Institute of Advanced Communication Technologies and Research, Govt of NCT of Delhi Delhi India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pandemic novel Coronavirus (Covid-19) is an infectious disease that primarily spreads by droplets of nose discharge when sneezing and saliva from the mouth when coughing, that had first been reported in Wuhan, China in December 2019. Covid-19 became a global pandemic, which led to a harmful impact on the world. Many predictive models of Covid-19 are being proposed by academic researchers around the world to take the foremost decisions and enforce the appropriate control measures. Due to the lack of accurate Covid-19 records and uncertainty, the standard techniques are being failed to correctly predict the epidemic global effects. To address this issue, we present an Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based meta-analysis to predict the trend of epidemic Covid-19 over the world. The powerful machine learning algorithms namely Naïve Bayes, Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Linear Regression were applied on real time-series dataset, which holds the global record of confirmed, recovered, deaths and active cases of Covid-19 outbreak. Statistical analysis has also been conducted to present various facts regarding Covid-19 observed symptoms, a list of Top-20 Coronavirus affected countries and a number of coactive cases over the world. Among the three machine learning techniques investigated, Naïve Bayes produced promising results to predict Covid-19 future trends with less Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Mean Squared Error (MSE). The less value of MAE and MSE strongly represent the effectiveness of the Naïve Bayes regression technique. Although, the global footprint of this pandemic is still uncertain. This study demonstrates the various trends and future growth of the global pandemic for a proactive response from the citizens and governments of countries. This paper sets the initial benchmark to demonstrate the capability of machine learning for outbreak prediction.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceCovid‐19data analyticslinear regressionmachine‐learning predictionNaïve Bayessupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID34177035
PMCPMC8209956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.