Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34176976›Full record

ArticleSIAM journal on applied mathematics2021

ENHANCED ELECTRODIFFUSIVE TRANSPORT ACROSS A MUCUS LAYER.

Owen L Lewis, James P Keener

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SIAM journal on applied mathematics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Owen L LewisDepartment of Mathematics & Statistics, University of New Mexico.
James P KeenerDepartment of Mathematics and Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah.

Funding

Modeling gastric mucus layer physiologyR01GM131408 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI FOGELSON, AARON L · 2018 to 2021
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM131408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffusive transport of small ionic species through mucus layers is a ubiquitous phenomenon in physiology. However, some debate remains regarding how the various characteristics of mucus (charge of the polymers themselves, binding affinity of ions with mucus) impact the rate at which small ions may diffuse through a hydrated mucus gel. Indeed it is not even clear if small ionic species diffuse through mucus gel at an appreciably different rate than they do in aqueous solution. Here, we present a mathematical description of the transport of two ionic species (hydrogen and chloride) through a mucus layer based on the Nernst-Planck equations of electrodiffusion. The model explicitly accounts for the binding affinity of hydrogen to the mucus material, as well as the Donnan potential that occurs at the interface between regions with and without mucus. Steady state fluxes of ionic species are quantified, as are their dependencies on the chemical properties of the mucus gel and the composition of the bath solution. We outline a mechanism for generating enhanced diffusive flux of hydrogen across the gel region, and hypothesize how this mechanism may be relevant to the apparently contradictory experimental data in the literature.

Identifiers

PMID34176976
PMCPMC8232554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.