Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34176670›Full record

ArticleNursing outlook

A mixed methods study of an organization's approach to the COVID-19 health care crisis.

Francesco Zaghini, Jacopo Fiorini, Lucilla Livigni, Gemma Carrabs, Alessandro Sili

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing outlook. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Francesco ZaghiniDepartment of Nursing Professions, University Hospital of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: francesco.zaghini@ptvonline.it.
Jacopo FioriniDepartment of Nursing Professions, University Hospital of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Lucilla LivigniOccupational Health Service, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Gemma CarrabsOccupational Health Service, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Alessandro SiliDepartment of Nursing Professions, University Hospital of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare emergency can increase work-related stress and reduce nurses' job satisfaction and quality of life. Managerial decisions and proactive interventions implemented to react to the emergency ensure the best patient outcomes. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to verify whether a proactive organizational approach can limit nurses' work-related stress and help preserve their job satisfaction and quality of life during a health emergency.

methodsA longitudinal mixed methods study was conducted. Data were collected before and after the transformation into a SARS-CoV-2 Hospital and the implementation of organizational interventions. Focus groups were conducted to investigate quantitative data.

findingsAfter the implementation of interventions and as the pandemic progressed, work-related stress decreased and job satisfaction and quality of life increased. DISCUSSION: Through proactive organization, even during an emergency, nurses are prepared for working, and work-related stress due to changes is reduced. Nurses are motivated and satisfied with their organization and management, and quality of life increases.

Indexed as

Organizational CultureQuality of LifeAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCOVID-19FemaleFocus GroupsHumansInfection ControlItalyJob SatisfactionLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNursing Staff, HospitalOccupational StressCOVID19Healthcare emergencyJob satisfactionNurseQuality of lifeWork-related stress

Identifiers

PMID34176670
PMCPMC8114768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.