ReviewBiological psychiatry2021
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells in Psychiatry: An Overview and Critical Perspective.
Review in Biological psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Host-microbiome relationship in depression: can human induced pluripotent stem cells play a role in unravelling mechanisms?NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2025Review
- Integrative transcriptomic and proteomic analysis reveals that SERPING1 inhibits neuronal proliferationWorld journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- Modeling common and rare genetic risk factors of neuropsychiatric disorders in human induced pluripotent stem cells.Schizophrenia research · 2024Review
- Scaled and efficient derivation of loss-of-function alleles in risk genes for neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders in human iPSCs.Stem cell reports · 2024Article
- Scaled and Efficient Derivation of Loss of Function Alleles in Risk Genes for Neurodevelopmental and Psychiatric Disorders in Human iPSC.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Comparing stem cells, transdifferentiation and brain organoids as tools for psychiatric research.Translational psychiatry · 2024Review
- Generation and Characterization of a Human-Derived and Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell (iPSC) Line from an Alzheimer's Disease Patient with Neuropsychiatric Symptoms.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Mechanisms of copy number variants in neuropsychiatric disorders: From genes to therapeutics.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2023Review
- Multiple genes in a single GWAS risk locus synergistically mediate aberrant synaptic development and function in human neurons.Cell genomics · 2023Article
- Deep psychophysiological phenotyping of adolescents and adults with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: a multilevel approach to defining core disease processes.BMC psychiatry · 2023Article
- On the utilization of the induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) model to study substance use disorders: A scoping review protocol.PloS one · 2023Article
- Recommendations, guidelines, and best practice for the use of human induced pluripotent stem cells for neuropharmacological studies of neuropsychiatric disorders.Neuroscience applied · 2023Review
- Variations in Aspects of Neural Precursor Cell Neurogenesis in a Human Model of HSV-1 Infection.Organogenesis · 2022Article
- CACNA1C (CaNeuropharmacology · 2022Review
- Schizophrenia: A scientific graveyard or a pragmatically useful diagnostic construct?Schizophrenia research · 2022Article
- Review
- Review
- Advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder through induced pluripotent stem cell models.Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPNReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A key challenge in psychiatry research is the development of high-fidelity model systems that can be experimentally manipulated to explore and test pathophysiological mechanisms of illness. In this respect, the emerging capacity to derive neural cells and circuits from human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) has generated significant excitement. This review aims to provide a critical appraisal of the potential for iPSCs in illuminating pathophysiological mechanisms in the context of other available technical approaches. We discuss the selection of iPSC phenotypes relevant to psychiatry, the information that researchers can draw on to help guide these decisions, and how researchers choose between the use of 2-dimensional cultures and the use of more complex 3-dimensional model systems. We discuss the strengths and limitations of current models and the challenges and opportunities that they present. Finally, we discuss the potential of iPSC-based model systems for clarifying the mechanisms underlying genetic risk for psychiatry and the steps that will be needed to ensure that robust and reliable conclusions can be drawn. We argue that while iPSC-based models are ideally placed to study fundamental processes occurring within and between neural cells, they are often less well suited for case-control studies, given issues relating to statistical power and the challenges in identifying which cellular phenotypes are meaningful at the level of the whole individual. Our aim is to highlight the importance of considering the hypotheses of a given study to guide decisions about which, if any, iPSC-based system is most appropriate to address it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.