Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34176520›Full record

ArticlePorcine health management2021

Effectiveness of two intramuscular combined vaccines for the control of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and porcine circovirus type 2 in growing pigs: a randomized field trial.

Gwenaël Boulbria, Sophie Brilland, Charlotte Teixeira-Costa, Mathieu Brissonnier, Mathieu Charles, Nathalie Capdevielle, Valérie Normand, Franck Bouchet, Pauline Berton, Roman Krejci and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Porcine health management, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gwenaël BoulbriaPorc.Spective Swine Vet Practice, ZA de Gohélève, 56920, Noyal-Pontivy, France. g.boulbria@porc.spective.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9169-4420
Sophie BrillandCeva Animal Health, 10, avenue de la Ballastière, 33500, Libourne, France.
Charlotte Teixeira-CostaPorc.Spective Swine Vet Practice, ZA de Gohélève, 56920, Noyal-Pontivy, France.
Mathieu BrissonnierPorc.Spective Swine Vet Practice, ZA de Gohélève, 56920, Noyal-Pontivy, France.
Mathieu CharlesCeva Animal Health, 10, avenue de la Ballastière, 33500, Libourne, France.
Nathalie CapdevielleCeva Animal Health, 10, avenue de la Ballastière, 33500, Libourne, France.
Valérie NormandPorc.Spective Swine Vet Practice, ZA de Gohélève, 56920, Noyal-Pontivy, France.
Franck BouchetPorc.Spective Swine Vet Practice, ZA de Gohélève, 56920, Noyal-Pontivy, France.
Pauline BertonPorc.Spective Swine Vet Practice, ZA de Gohélève, 56920, Noyal-Pontivy, France.
Roman KrejciCeva Animal Health, 10, avenue de la Ballastière, 33500, Libourne, France.
Arnaud LebretPorc.Spective Swine Vet Practice, ZA de Gohélève, 56920, Noyal-Pontivy, France.
Département Santé Animale · FRDermatology Consulting Services · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Porcine circovirus type 2 are two economically important pathogens affecting growing pigs. Control and prevention of both diseases can be accomplished by vaccination, together with biosecurity and good management practices. Many commercial vaccines are available. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of Hyogen® and Circovac® administered mixed at weaning and to compare this protocol with a competitor ready-to-use (RTU) vaccine. CASE PRESENTATION: A randomised field trial was designed in a commercial farrow-to-finish farm located in France. A total of 641 pigs born from 54 different sows were included in this study. Piglets at weaning were allocated into three groups: the first one vaccinated with Hyogen® and Circovac® combined (group A), the second one vaccinated with a competitor RTU vaccine (group B) and the last one unvaccinated. Only minor local reactions for both vaccination groups could be observed which revealed a good safety of both protocols. Both vaccination schemes in this trial didn't improve wean-to-slaughter growth performances but significantly reduced lung lesions, lung fissures and pleurisy at slaughter, produced a seroconversion for both M. hyopneumoniae and PCV-2 and significantly reduced the PCV-2 viral load in blood. When we compared groups A and B, we observed no significant differences in growth performances, mortality, clinical signs, percentages of affected lungs at slaughter, lung fissures and pleurisy, and no difference in pathogens detection. However, two statistical differences were observed between both vaccines: the mean lung lesion score and the percentage of extensive lung lesions were lower in group A. This is consistent with lower M. hyopneumoniae loads in the lower respiratory tract in pigs from group A but this difference was not statistically significant.

conclusionsResults reported in this case study must be considered with caution since it was done in only one farm. In this trial, Hyogen® and Circovac® mixed together under field conditions offered a successful protection of growing pigs and significantly decreased the extension of lung lesions during a natural field challenge when compared with a competitor RTU vaccine.

Indexed as

Mycoplasma hyopneumoniaePorcine circovirus 2qPCRSerologyVaccine

Identifiers

PMID34176520
PMCPMC8237417
OpenAlexW3174782899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.