Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34176517›Full record

ReviewBiomarker research2021

The contribution of single-cell analysis of acute leukemia in the therapeutic strategy.

Lamia Madaci, Julien Colle, Geoffroy Venton, Laure Farnault, Béatrice Loriod, Régis Costello

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomarker research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lamia MadaciLaboratoire TAGC/INSERM UMR 1090, Parc Scientifique de Luminy case 928, 163, Avenue de Luminy, Cedex 09, 13288, Marseille, France.
Julien ColleLaboratoire TAGC/INSERM UMR 1090, Parc Scientifique de Luminy case 928, 163, Avenue de Luminy, Cedex 09, 13288, Marseille, France.
Geoffroy VentonLaboratoire TAGC/INSERM UMR 1090, Parc Scientifique de Luminy case 928, 163, Avenue de Luminy, Cedex 09, 13288, Marseille, France.
Laure FarnaultLaboratoire TAGC/INSERM UMR 1090, Parc Scientifique de Luminy case 928, 163, Avenue de Luminy, Cedex 09, 13288, Marseille, France.
Béatrice LoriodLaboratoire TAGC/INSERM UMR 1090, Parc Scientifique de Luminy case 928, 163, Avenue de Luminy, Cedex 09, 13288, Marseille, France.
Régis CostelloLaboratoire TAGC/INSERM UMR 1090, Parc Scientifique de Luminy case 928, 163, Avenue de Luminy, Cedex 09, 13288, Marseille, France. regis.costello@free.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4086-1302
Inserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After decades during which the treatment of acute myeloblastic leukemia was limited to variations around a skeleton of cytarabine/anthracycline, targeted therapies appeared. These therapies, first based on monoclonal antibodies, also rely on specific inhibitors of various molecular abnormalities. A significant but modest prognosis improvement has been observed thanks to these new treatments that are limited by a high rate of relapse, due to the intrinsic chemo and immune-resistance of leukemia stem cell, together with the acquisition of these resistances by clonal evolution. Relapses are also influenced by the equilibrium between the pro or anti-tumor signals from the bone marrow stromal microenvironment and immune effectors. What should be the place of the targeted therapeutic options in light of the tumor heterogeneity inherent to leukemia and the clonal drift of which this type of tumor is capable? Novel approaches by single cell analysis and next generation sequencing precisely define clonal heterogeneity and evolution, leading to a personalized and time variable adapted treatment. Indeed, the evolution of leukemia, either spontaneous or under therapy selection pressure, is a very complex phenomenon. The model of linear evolution is to be forgotten because single cell analysis of samples at diagnosis and at relapse show that tumor escape to therapy occurs from ancestral as well as terminal clones. The determination by the single cell technique of the trajectories of the different tumor sub-populations allows the identification of clones that accumulate factors of resistance to chemo/immunotherapy ("pan-resistant clones"), making possible to choose the combinatorial agents most likely to eradicate these cells. In addition, the single cell technique identifies the nature of each cell and can analyze, on the same sample, both the tumor cells and their environment. It is thus possible to evaluate the populations of immune effectors (T-lymphocytes, natural killer cells) for the leukemia stress-induced alteration of their functions. Finally, the single cells techniques are an invaluable tool for evaluation of the measurable residual disease since not only able to quantify but also to determine the most appropriate treatment according to the sensitivity profile to immuno-chemotherapy of remaining leukemic cells.

Indexed as

Acute myeloid leukemiaClonal evolutionDrug resistanceLeukemia stem cellNext generation sequencingSingle cellTargeted therapyTumor heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID34176517
PMCPMC8237443
OpenAlexW3176360199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.