Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34176474›Full record

ReviewBMC medical ethics2021

Why should HCWs receive priority access to vaccines in a pandemic?

Xavier Symons, Steve Matthews, Bernadette Tobin

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC medical ethics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Xavier SymonsPlunkett Centre for Ethics, Australian Catholic University, 7 Ice Street, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia. xavier.symons@acu.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-9495-4395
Steve MatthewsPlunkett Centre for Ethics, Australian Catholic University, 7 Ice Street, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia.
Bernadette TobinPlunkett Centre for Ethics, Australian Catholic University, 7 Ice Street, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia.
Australian Catholic University · AUThomas More University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundViral pandemics present a range of ethical challenges for policy makers, not the least among which are difficult decisions about how to allocate scarce healthcare resources. One important question is whether healthcare workers (HCWs) should receive priority access to a vaccine in the event that an effective vaccine becomes available. This question is especially relevant in the coronavirus pandemic with governments and health authorities currently facing questions of distribution of COVID-19 vaccines. MAIN TEXT: In this article, we critically evaluate the most common ethical arguments for granting healthcare workers priority access to a vaccine. We review the existing literature on this topic, and analyse both deontological and utilitarian arguments in favour of HCW prioritisation. For illustrative purposes, we focus in particular on the distribution of a COVID-19 vaccine. We also explore some practical complexities attendant on arguments in favour of HCW prioritisation.

conclusionsWe argue that there are deontological and utilitarian cases for prioritising HCWs. Indeed, the widely held view that we should prioritise HCWs represents an example of ethical convergence. Complexities arise, however, when considering who should be included in the category of HCW, and who else should receive priority in addition to HCWs.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsCOVID-19 VaccinesHealth PersonnelHumansSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19DeontologyHealthcare resource allocationPolicyReciprocityUtilitarianismVaccines

Identifiers

PMID34176474
PMCPMC8236218
OpenAlexW3173245746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.