Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34176150›Full record

ArticlePrenatal diagnosis2021

Open intrauterine repair of spina bifida aperta: Historical aspects, current availability, and clinical outcomes from the Latin American Spina Bifida Consortium.

Waldo Sepulveda, Rogelio Cruz-Martinez, Adolfo Etchegaray, Jose Sanin-Blair, Walter Ventura, Edgardo Corral, Rolando Marquez

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Prenatal diagnosis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Benefits and complications of fetal and postnatal surgery for open spina bifida: systematic review and proportional meta-analysis.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Implementation ofAJOG global reports · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Waldo SepulvedaFETALMED-Maternal-Fetal Diagnostic Center, Santiago, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3856-574X
Rogelio Cruz-MartinezHospital San Jose and Hospital de Especialidades del Niño y la Mujer, Queretaro, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5999-866X
Adolfo EtchegarayHospital Universitario Austral, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6241-0596
Jose Sanin-BlairClinica Universitaria Bolivariana, Medellin, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0720-9248
Walter VenturaInstituto Nacional Materno-Perinatal, Lima, Peru.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2888-1394
Edgardo CorralHospital Regional, Rancagua, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0128-7210
Rolando MarquezHospital Carlos van Buren, Valparaiso, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7531-8927

Funding

Fetal Medicine Foundation Mexico No numberSociedad Profesional de Medicina Fetal 'Fetalmed' Ltda. Unrestricted research grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the historical aspects, current availability, and clinical outcomes of open intrauterine repair of spina bifida aperta (IRSBA) in Spanish-speaking Latin American countries.

methodsCases were collected from centers with at least 2 years of experience and a minimum of 10 open IRSBA interventions by December 2020. Clinical variables were compared to the results of the Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS) trial.

resultsClinical experience with 314 cases from seven centers was reviewed. Most cases (n = 189, 60.2%) were performed between 24 and 25.9 weeks' gestation. Delivery at less than 30 weeks' gestation occurred in 36 cases (11.5%) and the overall perinatal mortality rate was 5.4% (17 of 314). The rate of maternal complications was low, including the need for blood transfusion (n = 3, 0.9%) and dehiscence or a thin uterine scar (n = 4, 1.3%). No cases of maternal death were recorded. Fifteen neonates required additional surgical repair of the spinal defect (4.8%) and 63 of 167 infants (37.7%) required a cerebrospinal fluid diversion procedure. Only two of the seven centers reported preliminary experience with fetoscopic IRSBA.

conclusionsClinical experience and outcomes were within the expected results reported by the MOMS trial. There is still very limited experience with fetoscopic IRSBA in this part of the world.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleFetusGestational AgeHealth Services AccessibilityHumansLatin AmericaOutcome Assessment, Health CarePregnancySpina Bifida Cystica

Identifiers

PMID34176150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.