Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34176147›Full record

ArticleMedical education2021

Bidirectional learning opportunities: How GP-supervisors and trainees exchange knowledge.

Lisanne S Welink, Tessa C van Charldorp, Laura Di Colandrea, Marie-Louise L Bartelink, Peter Pype, Roger A M J Damoiseaux, Esther de Groot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lisanne S WelinkJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0525-2333
Tessa C van CharldorpFaculty of Humanities, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Laura Di ColandreaJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marie-Louise L BartelinkJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Peter PypeDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2273-0250
Roger A M J DamoiseauxJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8052-0302
Esther de GrootJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0388-385X

Funding

ZonMw 839130005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWorkplace-based learning conversations can be a good opportunity for supervisors and trainees to learn from each other. When both professionals discuss their specific knowledge openly with each other, learning conversations may be a useful educational tool, for instance for learning how to apply evidence-based medicine (EBM) in the workplace. We do, however, need a better understanding of how the exchange of knowledge provides opportunities for such bidirectional learning. The aim of this study was therefore to analyse how trainees and supervisors currently handle bidirectional learning opportunities by describing in detail how supervisors respond to knowledge expressed by trainees during a learning conversation.

methodWe video-recorded learning conversations between supervisors and trainees in general practice (GP). Within these learning conversations, EBM discussions on medical topics were selected and transcribed. We then identified, analysed using Conversation Analysis (CA) and categorised each expression of knowledge by the trainee and the supervisor's subsequent response.

resultsWe found that when a trainee expresses knowledge during the learning conversation, supervisors either (a) refute the expressed knowledge, (b) immediately suggest an alternative or (c) pose (additional) questions. These responses have consequences for the learning opportunities of both trainee and supervisor: it is only when supervisors pose further questions that trainees are encouraged to elaborate on their knowledge, leading to a bidirectional learning opportunity. DISCUSSION: Improving EBM learning opportunities for both supervisors and trainees requires more than simply instructing trainees to express knowledge-based-for instance-on recent evidence more often. Inflexible institutional roles related to historical claims of supervisors' epistemic authority hamper bidirectional learning. Posing open questions during learning conversations enhances the flexibility of institutional roles while also creating bidirectional learning opportunities.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceGeneral PracticeEducation, Medical, GraduateFamily PracticeHumansQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID34176147
PMCPMC9291942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.