Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34176101›Full record

ArticleCell biochemistry and biophysics2021

Static Magnetic Stimulation Induces Changes in the Oxidative Status and Cell Viability Parameters in a Primary Culture Model of Astrocytes.

Caroline Crespo da Costa, Léo Anderson Meira Martins, André Peres Koth, Jéssica Marques Obelar Ramos, Fátima Theresinha Costa Rodrigues Guma, Cleverson Moraes de Oliveira, Nathália Stark Pedra, Geferson Fischer, Eduarda Santa Helena, Carolina Rosa Gioda and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cell biochemistry and biophysics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Caroline Crespo da CostaNeuroCell Laboratory, Universidade Federal de Pelotas Campus Universitário, S/N, Capão do Leão-RS, 96160-000, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5630-1297
Léo Anderson Meira MartinsDepartment of Physiology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Sarmento Leite, 500, Bairro Centro Histórico, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90050-170, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0878-0489
André Peres KothNeuroCell Laboratory, Universidade Federal de Pelotas Campus Universitário, S/N, Capão do Leão-RS, 96160-000, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5862-4591
Jéssica Marques Obelar RamosNeuroCell Laboratory, Universidade Federal de Pelotas Campus Universitário, S/N, Capão do Leão-RS, 96160-000, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1213-4519
Fátima Theresinha Costa Rodrigues GumaDepartment of Biochemistry, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2600, Bairro Santa Cecília, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-000, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2369-7739
Cleverson Moraes de OliveiraDepartment of Biochemistry, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2600, Bairro Santa Cecília, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-000, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0861-6136
Nathália Stark PedraLaboratory of Neurochemistry, Inflammation and Cancer, Universidade Federal de Pelotas Campus Universitário, S/N, Capão do Leão-RS, 96160-000, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8662-7661
Geferson FischerLaboratory of Virology and Immunology, Universidade Federal de Pelotas Campus Universitário, S/N, Capão do Leão-RS, 96160-000, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3521-395X
Eduarda Santa HelenaDepartment of Physiological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Rio Grande Avenida Itália, Km 8, Bairro Carreiros, Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, 96203-900, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3286-8771
Carolina Rosa GiodaDepartment of Physiological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Rio Grande Avenida Itália, Km 8, Bairro Carreiros, Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, 96203-900, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5975-1675
Paulo Roberto Stefani SanchesLaboratory of the Research and Development Service in Biomedical Engineering- Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2350- Bairro Santa Cecília, Porto Alegre-RS, 90035-903, Brasil.
Antonio Sergio Varela JuniorInstitute of Biological Science, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande Avenida Itália, Km 8, Bairro Carreiros, Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, 96203-900, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4901-5118
Mayara Sandrielly Pereira SoaresLaboratory of Neurochemistry, Inflammation and Cancer, Universidade Federal de Pelotas Campus Universitário, S/N, Capão do Leão-RS, 96160-000, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2181-3591
Rosélia Maria SpanevelloLaboratory of Neurochemistry, Inflammation and Cancer, Post-Graduate Program in Biochemistry and Bioprospection, Universidade Federal de Pelotas Campus Universitário, S/N, Capão do Leão-RS, 96160-000, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5117-2000
Giovana Duzzo GamaroNeuroCell Laboratory, Universidade Federal de Pelotas Campus Universitário, S/N, Capão do Leão-RS, 96160-000, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1674-1693
Izabel Cristina Custódio de SouzaCoordinator of NeuroCell Laboratory, Laboratory of Histology, Department of Morphology, Post-Graduate Program in Biochemistry and Bioprospection, Universidade Federal de Pelotas Avenida Duque de Caxias, 250, 96030-000, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. izabel.souza@ufpel.edu.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6117-1810

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Astrocytes play an important role in the central nervous system function and may contribute to brain plasticity response during static magnetic fields (SMF) brain therapy. However, most studies evaluate SMF stimulation in brain plasticity while few studies evaluate the consequences of SMF at the cellular level. Thus, we here evaluate the effects of SMF at 305 mT (medium-intensity) in a primary culture of healthy/normal cortical astrocytes obtained from neonatal (1 to 2-day-old) Wistar rats. After reaching confluence, cells were daily subjected to SMF stimulation for 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, and 40 min during 7 consecutive days. Oxidative stress parameters, cell cycle, cell viability, and mitochondrial function were analyzed. The antioxidant capacity was reduced in groups stimulated for 5 and 40 min. Although no difference was observed in the enzymatic activity of superoxide dismutase and catalase or the total thiol content, lipid peroxidation was increased in all stimulated groups. The cell cycle was changed after 40 min of SMF stimulation while 15, 30, and 40 min led cells to death by necrosis. Mitochondrial function was reduced after SMF stimulation, although imaging analysis did not reveal substantial changes in the mitochondrial network. Results mainly revealed that SMF compromised healthy astrocytes' oxidative status and viability. This finding reveals how important is to understand the SMF stimulation at the cellular level since this therapeutic approach has been largely used against neurological and psychiatric diseases.

Indexed as

AstrocytesCell SurvivalMagnetic FieldsMitochondriaOxidative StressRats, WistarAnimalsCatalaseCell CycleCells, CulturedLipid PeroxidationRatsSuperoxide DismutaseCatalaseSuperoxide DismutaseAstrocytesCell viabilityMitochondrial functionOxidative stressStatic magnetic field

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.