Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34176039›Full record

ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2022

Diagnostic yield of small bowel capsule endoscopy in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: a real-world prospective study.

Samanta Romeo, Benedetto Neri, Michelangela Mossa, Maria Elena Riccioni, Ludovica Scucchi, Giorgia Sena, Saverio Potenza, Carmelina Petruzziello, Livia Biancone

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samanta Romeo *Department of Systems Medicine, University "Tor Vergata" of Rome, Vie Montpellier, 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Benedetto Neri *Department of Systems Medicine, University "Tor Vergata" of Rome, Vie Montpellier, 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Michelangela MossaDepartment of Systems Medicine, University "Tor Vergata" of Rome, Vie Montpellier, 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Maria Elena RiccioniDepartment of Traslational Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Ludovica ScucchiDepartment of Systems Medicine, University "Tor Vergata" of Rome, Vie Montpellier, 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Giorgia SenaDepartment of Systems Medicine, University "Tor Vergata" of Rome, Vie Montpellier, 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Saverio PotenzaDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University "Tor Vergata" of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Carmelina PetruzzielloDepartment of Systems Medicine, University "Tor Vergata" of Rome, Vie Montpellier, 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Livia BianconeDepartment of Systems Medicine, University "Tor Vergata" of Rome, Vie Montpellier, 1, 00133, Rome, Italy. biancone@med.uniroma2.it.
University of Rome Tor Vergata · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) visualizes the small bowel (SB) mucosa. Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding from SB accounts for the majority of SBCE indications. We aimed to assess, in a "real-world" prospective study, the diagnostic yield of SBCE in a cohort of consecutive patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB). Secondary end point was to assess the frequency of adverse events and the role of SBCE in determining the diagnostic work-up and clinical outcome. From 2016 to 2018, all patients referred for SBCE examination were enrolled. Indication for SBCE was re-assessed by 2 dedicated gastroenterologists. Inclusion criteria: (1) age ≥ 18 and ≤ 85 years; (2) diagnosis of OGIB; 3) non-diagnostic standard bidirectional endoscopy; (4) informed consent. Exclusion criteria: (1) deglutition impairment; (2) SBCE contraindications; (3) pregnancy. The cohort included 50 patients [males 18 (36%), age 68 (27-83)]. SBCE indication: patients with ongoing overt OGIB (Group A) (n = 11; 22%), previous overt OGIB (Group B) (n = 14; 28%), occult bleeding (with Iron Deficiency Anaemia) (Group C) (n = 25; 50%). SBCE detected clinically relevant lesions in 46 (92%) cases. Clinically relevant lesions were more frequent in Group C (24/25; 96%), followed by Group A (10/11; 91%) and Group B (12/14; 85.5%). After SBCE, treatment was medical (60%); endoscopic (14%), surgical (36%) or conservative (18%). Clinical follow-up showed complete resolution in 63.2%, partial/absent resolution in 18.4% of cases. In a prospective study, the high diagnostic yield of SBCE supports its role as first-line investigation in patients with OGIB. However, this achievement requires an accurate and timely assessment by dedicated gastroenterologists.

Indexed as

Capsule EndoscopyAgedAged, 80 and overGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansIntestine, SmallMaleProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesBleedingDedicated gastroenterologistDiagnostic yieldEndoscopyObscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB)Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy (SBCE)

Identifiers

PMID34176039
PMCPMC8964573
OpenAlexW3174740431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.