Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34176017›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021

Knowledge and attitudes of Italian medical oncologists and palliative care physicians toward medical use of cannabis in cancer care: a national survey.

Marco Filetti, Dario Trapani, Alessio Cortellini, Vincenza Cofini, Stefano Necozione, David James Pinato, Giampiero Porzio, Paolo Marchetti, Raffaele Giusti

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. State of the Science: Health Care Provider Communication of Cannabis Use Among Adults Living with Cancer.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Marco FilettiMedical Oncology Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, Rome, Italy.
Dario TrapaniDivision of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Alessio CortelliniDepartment of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Science, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Vincenza CofiniDepartment of Clinical Medicine Life Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Stefano NecozioneDepartment of Clinical Medicine Life Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
David James PinatoDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Giampiero PorzioDepartment of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Science, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Paolo MarchettiMedical Oncology Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, Rome, Italy.
Raffaele GiustiMedical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Sant'Andrea, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-39 00189, Rome, Italy. rgiusti@ospedalesantandrea.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4592-8868
University of L'Aquila · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea · ITEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite advances in supportive care, cancer-related symptoms tend to be persistent regardless of cancer type, stage of disease, or treatment received. There is an increasing prescription for complementary and alternative medicines, such as medical cannabis (MC). Knowledge and attitudes of Italian medical oncologists and palliative care physicians toward medical cannabis in cancer care remain unknown.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study to investigate the knowledge and attitude toward MC prescription among cancer care professionals in Italy. All invited participants received an email with the electronic questionnaire accessible through a direct link.

resultsAmong the 2616 members who received the invitation, 475 replied to the questionnaire and were considered for the survey analysis. The most prescribed formulations among those available in Italy were cannabis FM2. The most frequent clinical indications for the use of MC were pain, gastrointestinal, and mood disorders. Only 9 responders reported MC-related side effects like anxiety insomnia and muscle spasms. The question regarding the normative references for MC prescription and use in Italy had conflicting results: only 14% indicated the exact legislative reference.

conclusionOur study highlights a significant discrepancy between personal attitudes, prescription levels, and actual knowledge on MC. This represent a critical issue that should be systemically faced, building educational programs and national guidelines that sublimate personal physicians' beliefs and predispositions, resulting in a robust science-based MC practice. Only through coordinated interventions on science and health policy of MC, there will be success of safety and efficacy, ensuring the best knowledge for the best outcomes.

Indexed as

CannabisMedical MarijuanaNeoplasmsOncologistsPhysiciansAttitudeAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesHumansItalyPalliative CareSurveys and QuestionnairesMedical MarijuanaCancerCannabisMedical marijuanaOncologyPalliative care

Identifiers

PMID34176017
OpenAlexW3176623258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.