Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34176001›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2021

Consensus statement of the Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of pilonidal disease.

M Milone, L Basso, M Manigrasso, R Pietroletti, A Bondurri, M La Torre, G Milito, M Pozzo, D Segre, R Perinotti and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05474911 (RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE CLINICAL STUDY BETWEEN TWO TREATMENT STRATEGIES IN PATIENTS WITH PILONIDAL SINUS), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05474911 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Randomized comparative clinical study between two treatment strategies in patients with pilonidal sinus: conventional care versus negative pressure therapy.

TypeinterventionalSponsorSebastiano BiondoRan2022 to 2023Enrolled94ConditionsPilonidal Sinus, Wound HealArmsNegative pressure therapy, Conventional wound care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Platelet-rich plasma for pilonidal disease: a systematic review.The Journal of international medical research · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

M MiloneDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, "Federico II" University, Naples, Italy.
L Basso"Pietro Valdoni" Department of Surgery, Policlinico "Umberto I", "Sapienza" University of Rome, viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy. luigi.basso@uniroma1.it.ORCID 0000-0002-6198-6964
M ManigrassoDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, "Federico II" University, Naples, Italy.
R PietrolettiSurgical Coloproctology, "Val Vibrata" Hospital, "L'Aquila" University, Sant'Omero, TE, Italy.
A BondurriDepartment of General Surgery, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, "Luigi Sacco" University Hospital, Milan, Italy.
M La TorreColoproctology Unit, "S. Anna" Clinic, Pomezia, RM, Italy.
G MilitoDepartment of General Surgery, "Tor Vergata" University, Rome, Italy.
M PozzoDepartment of General Surgery, "Degli Infermi" Hospital, Biella, Italy.
D SegreGeneral Surgery Operative Unit, "Città di Bra" Clinic, Bra, CN, Italy.
R Perinotti *Department of General Surgery, "Degli Infermi" Hospital, Biella, Italy.
G Gallo *Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, "Magna Graecia" University, Catanzaro, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pilonidal disease (PD) is a relatively common, benign but challenging condition of the natal cleft. This consensus statement was drawn up by a panel of surgeons, identified by the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR) as having a "special interest" in PD, with the aim of recommending the best therapeutic options according to currently available scientific evidence. A three-step modified-Delphi process was adopted, implying: (1) choice of the panelists; (2) development of a discussion outline and of target issues; and (3) a detailed systematic review of the current literature. The agreement/disagreement level was scored on a five-point Likert scale as follows: "A + : strongly agree; A-: agree; N: unsure/no opinion; D-: disagree; D + : strongly disagree. Each panelist contributed to the production of this manuscript, and the final recommendations were reviewed by the Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee.

Indexed as

Colorectal SurgeryDigestive System Surgical ProceduresConsensusDelphi TechniqueHumansItalyPractice Guidelines as TopicConsensusMinimally invasive approachOperative managementPilonidal disease PDPilonidal sinus

Identifiers

PMID34176001
PMCPMC8580911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.