ArticleUrolithiasis2022
Evaluation of the anatomical factors affecting the success of retrograde intrarenal surgery for isolated lower pole kidney stones.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of infundibulopelvic angle on outcomes of ureteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of urology · 2024Pooled it
- International Alliance of Urolithiasis guideline on retrograde intrarenal surgery.BJU international · 2023Guideline
- The relationship between stone-free and patient position in retrograde intrarenal surgery: a randomized prospective study.World journal of urology · 2024Trial
- Prediction model for additional procedure requirement in flexible ureterorenoscopy using explainable artificial intelligence.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Effect of prior diverse surgical histories on the efficacy and safety of one-stage retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with renal stone: a retrospective study.Frontiers in urology · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of scoring systems for patients undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery with isolated lower calyx stones.World journal of urology · 2024Article
- Needle-perc-assisted endoscopic surgery versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 1- to 2-cm lower-pole renal stones in patients with unfavorable infundibulopelvic anatomy: a matched-pair analysis.World journal of urology · 2024Article
- New infundibulopelvic angle measurement method can predict stone-free rates following retrograde intrarenal surgery.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Flexible ureteroscopy for lower pole calculus: is it still a challenge?World journal of urology · 2023Review
- The effect of percussion, diuresis and inversion therapy on RIRS success for lower renal pole stones.Central European journal of urology · 2023Article
- Will the advances in retrograde intrarenal surgery extinguish percutaneous nephrolithotomy for stones larger than 2 cm?International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyArticle
- An innovative predictive scoring system for assessing stone-free rate of lower caliceal stones after flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a retrospective cohort study.Therapeutic advances in urologyArticle
- Role of low-Therapeutic advances in urologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studies which examine the factors affecting success rate in kidney stones located in the lower pole as well as the effects of infundibulopelvic angle (IPA) and infundibular length (IL) have been conducted with a small number of patients. We aimed to evaluate the cut-off points of IPA and IL parameters that effect the success of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for isolated lower pole kidney stones. This retrospective study includes 168 patients who underwent primary RIRS due to isolated lower pole kidney stones in our clinic between January 2013 and May 2020. Pre-operative demographic data, medical history, physical examination, surgery duration as well as the post-operative hospitalization time of patients specifics were obtained. According to pre-operative computed tomography (CT), stone size, stone burden, stone density, number of stones (single and multiple), stone laterality, congenital kidney abnormality, the presence of solitary kidney, parameters of IPA and IL were measured and both included in the study. All patients were divided into two groups as the successful group and the unsuccessful group according to their post-operative success. These two groups were compared in terms of pre and post-operative data. Stone burden, IPA < 42.65°, and IL > 27.5 mm were specified as the independent risk factors for success of RIRS procedure. The patients for whom RIRS procedure is planned for lower pole kidney stones, stone burden, IPA, and IL should be taken into consideration to be able to predict success and it should be kept in mind that additional treatment may be required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.