Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34175969›Full record

Observational studyEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2022

Hearing recovery after surgical resection of non-vestibular schwannoma cerebellopontine angle tumors.

Naira Mkrtchyan, Lauranne Alciato, Michel Kalamarides, Daniele Bernardeschi, Olivier Sterkers, Isabelle Bernat, Mustapha Smail, Nadya Pyatigorskaya, Ghizlene Lahlou

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Naira MkrtchyanGroupe Hospitalo-Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie, APHP Sorbonne Université, 47-83 boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1678-2030
Lauranne AlciatoGroupe Hospitalo-Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie, APHP Sorbonne Université, 47-83 boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5928-1511
Michel KalamaridesGroupe Hospitalo-Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département de Neurochirurgie, APHP Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1037-9707
Daniele BernardeschiGroupe Hospitalo-Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie, APHP Sorbonne Université, 47-83 boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5937-8847
Olivier SterkersGroupe Hospitalo-Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie, APHP Sorbonne Université, 47-83 boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2054-3104
Isabelle BernatGroupe Hospitalo-Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département de Neurologie, APHP Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Mustapha SmailGroupe Hospitalo-Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie, APHP Sorbonne Université, 47-83 boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France.
Nadya PyatigorskayaGroupe Hospitalo-Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département de Neuroradiologie, APHP Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2070-1299
Ghizlene LahlouGroupe Hospitalo-Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie, APHP Sorbonne Université, 47-83 boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France. ghizlene.lahlou@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1067-045X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePost-operative outcomes for hearing after resection surgery to remove cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumors other than vestibular schwannomas (VS) are not well understood. This study presents a series of patients with significant post-operative hearing recovery, trying to define the incidence among all patients operated on for removal of non-VS CPA tumors.

methodsThis is a retrospective observational case series of 8 patients among 69 operated on for removal of non-VS CPA tumors between 2012 and 2020. All patients had pre- and post-operative hearing measurement with pure-tone average (PTA) and speech discrimination score (SDS), according to the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery recommendations, auditory brainstem response (ABR) measurements and imaging.

resultsSix meningiomas and two lower cranial nerve schwannomas operated on with a retrosigmoid approach were included for analysis. The mean pre-operative PTA and SDS were 58 ± 20.7 dB and 13 ± 17.5%, respectively. All patients had pre-operative class D hearing and asynchronous ABRs. They all showed significant hearing recovery, with an improvement of 36 ± 22.2 dB (p = 0.0025) and 85 ± 16.9% (p = 0.0001) in PTA and SDS, respectively, with mean follow-up of 21 ± 23.5 months. Seven patients recovered to a class A hearing level and one patient to class B. The ABRs became synchronous for three patients. The incidence of auditory recovery was 13% for patients operated on with a conservative approach (n = 60).

conclusionA significant post-operative improvement in hearing could be a reasonable expectation in non-VS tumors extending into the CPA and a retrosigmoid approach should always be considered regardless of pre-operative hearing status.

Indexed as

Meningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaNeuroma, AcousticCerebellopontine AngleHearingHearing TestsHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCerebellopontine angle tumorsHearingMeningiomaRetrosigmoid approachSchwannoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.