Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34175902›Full record

ReviewLeukemia2021

Increasing recognition and emerging therapies argue for dedicated clinical trials in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.

Aline Renneville, Mrinal M Patnaik, Onyee Chan, Eric Padron, Eric Solary

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Leukemia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. The Role of Inflammation in CMML Pathobiology and Progression.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Aline RennevilleINSERM U1287, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
Mrinal M PatnaikDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6998-662X
Onyee ChanDepartment of Malignant Hematology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2872-1961
Eric PadronDepartment of Malignant Hematology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4707-7916
Eric SolaryINSERM U1287, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France. Eric.solary@gustaveroussy.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8629-1341
Moffitt Cancer Center · USInserm · FRMayo Clinic in Arizona · USUniversité Paris-Sud · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorder with overlapping features of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). Median overall survival of this aggressive myeloid malignancy is only 2-3 years, with a 15-30% risk of acute leukemic transformation. The paucity of clinical trials specifically designed for CMML has made therapeutic management of CMML patients challenging. As a result, treatment paradigms for CMML patients are largely borrowed from MDS and MPN. The standard of care still relies on hydroxyurea, hypomethylating agents (HMA), and allogeneic stem cell transplantation, this latter option remaining the only potentially curative therapy. To date, approved drugs for CMML treatment are HMA, including azacitidine, decitabine, and more recently the oral combination of decitabine and cedazuridine. However, HMA treatment does not meaningfully alter the natural course of this disease. New treatment approaches for improving CMML-associated cytopenias or targeting the CMML malignant clone are emerging. More than 25 therapeutic agents are currently being evaluated in phase 1 or phase 2 clinical trials for CMML and other myeloid malignancies, often in combination with a HMA backbone. Several novel agents, such as sotatercept, ruxolitinib, lenzilumab, and tagraxofusp have shown promising clinical efficacy in CMML. Current evidence supports the idea that effective treatment in CMML will likely require combination therapy targeting multiple pathways, which emphasizes the need for additional new therapeutic options. This review focuses on recent therapeutic advances and innovative treatment strategies in CMML, including global and molecularly targeted approaches. We also discuss what may help to make progress in the design of rationally derived and disease-modifying therapies for CMML.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicCombined Modality TherapyDNA MethylationHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansHydroxyureaLeukemia, Myelomonocytic, ChronicAntineoplastic AgentsHydroxyurea

Identifiers

PMID34175902
OpenAlexW3175969170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.