Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34175654›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2021

SARM1 signaling mechanisms in the injured nervous system.

Shilpa Sambashivan, Marc R Freeman

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Study of Axonal Injury and Degeneration inCold Spring Harbor protocols · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shilpa SambashivanNura Bio, San Francisco, CA, USA. Electronic address: ssambashivan@nurabio.com.
Marc R FreemanVollum Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA. Electronic address: freemmar@ohsu.edu.
Sana Biotechnology (United States) · USVollum Institute · US

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms of Axon DegenerationR01NS059991 · NINDS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI FREEMAN, MARC R · 2008 to 2023
$5.4M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS059991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Axon degeneration is a prominent feature of the injured nervous system, occurs across neurological diseases, and drives functional loss in neural circuits. We have seen a paradigm shift in the last decade with the realization that injured axons are capable of actively driving their own destruction through the sterile-alpha and TIR motif containing 1 (SARM1) protein. Early studies of Wallerian degeneration highlighted a central role for NAD

Indexed as

Armadillo Domain ProteinsCytoskeletal ProteinsAnimalsAxonsMiceMice, KnockoutWallerian DegenerationArmadillo Domain ProteinsCytoskeletal ProteinsSARM1 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID34175654
PMCPMC8387414
OpenAlexW3177063927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.