Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34175613›Full record

ReviewDiagnostic microbiology and infectious disease2021

Pooled Testing Strategies for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis: A comprehensive review.

Evangeline Ann Daniel, Bennett Henzeler Esakialraj L, Anbalagan S, Kannan Muthuramalingam, Ramesh Karunaianantham, Lucia Precilla Karunakaran, Manohar Nesakumar, Murugesan Selvachithiram, Sathyamurthi Pattabiraman, Sudhakar Natarajan and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Laboratory Diagnosis for SARS-CoV-2 Infection.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Evangeline Ann DanielDepartment of HIV/AIDS, National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India. Electronic address: evangelineanndaniel@gmail.com.
Bennett Henzeler Esakialraj LDepartment of HIV/AIDS, National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.
Anbalagan SDepartment of HIV/AIDS, National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.
Kannan MuthuramalingamDepartment of HIV/AIDS, National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.
Ramesh KarunaiananthamDepartment of HIV/AIDS, National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.
Lucia Precilla KarunakaranDepartment of HIV/AIDS, National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.
Manohar NesakumarDepartment of HIV/AIDS, National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.
Murugesan SelvachithiramDepartment of HIV/AIDS, National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.
Sathyamurthi PattabiramanDepartment of HIV/AIDS, National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.
Sudhakar NatarajanDepartment of HIV/AIDS, National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.
Srikanth Prasad TripathyDepartment of HIV/AIDS, National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.
Luke Elizabeth HannaDepartment of HIV/AIDS, National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India. Electronic address: hannatrc@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 has surged across the globe causing the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Systematic testing to facilitate index case isolation and contact tracing is needed for efficient containment of viral spread. The major bottleneck in leveraging testing capacity has been the lack of diagnostic resources. Pooled testing is a potential approach that could reduce cost and usage of test kits. This method involves pooling individual samples and testing them 'en bloc'. Only if the pool tests positive, retesting of individual samples is performed. Upon reviewing recent articles on this strategy employed in various SARS-CoV-2 testing scenarios, we found substantial diversity emphasizing the requirement of a common protocol. In this article, we review various theoretically simulated and clinically validated pooled testing models and propose practical guidelines on applying this strategy for large scale screening. If implemented properly, the proposed approach could contribute to proper utilization of testing resources and flattening of infection curve.

Indexed as

Specimen HandlingCOVID-19COVID-19 Nucleic Acid TestingHumansMass ScreeningReproducibility of ResultsSARS-CoV-2Sensitivity and SpecificityCOVID-19DiagnosisPooled testingRT-PCRSARS-CoV-2Sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID34175613
PMCPMC8127528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.