Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34175570›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanics2021

Moving outside the lab: Markerless motion capture accurately quantifies sagittal plane kinematics during the vertical jump.

John F Drazan, William T Phillips, Nidhi Seethapathi, Todd J Hullfish, Josh R Baxter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Decoding fetal motion in 4D ultrasound with DeepLabCut.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

John F DrazanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
William T PhillipsElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of Rochester, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States.
Nidhi SeethapathiDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Todd J HullfishDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Josh R BaxterDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States. Electronic address: josh.baxter@uphs.upenn.edu.

Funding

University of Pennsylvania Postdoctoral Opportunities in Research and TeachingK12GM081259 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Janis K. Burkhardt · 2007 to 2026
$20.1M
Overall: Resource-based Center for Musculoskeletal Disorders Research (Overall Application)P30AR069619 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LOUIS J SOSLOWSKY · 2016 to 2026
$9.1M
Modifying muscle remodeling following Achilles tendon rupturesK01AR075877 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BAXTER, JOSH · 2020 to 2024
$609k
NIAMS NIH HHS K01 AR075877NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR069619NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM081259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Markerless motion capture using deep learning approaches have potential to revolutionize the field of biomechanics by allowing researchers to collect data outside of the laboratory environment, yet there remain questions regarding the accuracy and ease of use of these approaches. The purpose of this study was to apply a markerless motion capture approach to extract lower limb angles in the sagittal plane during the vertical jump and to evaluate agreement between the custom trained model and gold standard motion capture. We performed this study using a large open source data set (N = 84) that included synchronized commercial video and gold standard motion capture. We split these data into a training set for model development (n = 69) and test set to evaluate capture performance relative to gold standard motion capture using coefficient of multiple correlations (CMC) (n = 15). We found very strong agreement between the custom trained markerless approach and marker-based motion capture within the test set across the entire movement (CMC > 0.991, RMSE < 3.22°), with at least strong CMC values across all trials for the hip (0.853 ± 0.23), knee (0.963 ± 0.471), and ankle (0.970 ± 0.055). The strong agreement between markerless and marker-based motion capture provides evidence that markerless motion capture is a viable tool to extend data collection to outside of the laboratory. As biomechanical research struggles with representative sampling practices, markerless motion capture has potential to transform biomechanical research away from traditional laboratory settings into venues convenient to populations that are under sampled without sacrificing measurement fidelity.

Indexed as

Ankle JointLaboratoriesBiomechanical PhenomenaKnee JointMotionBiomechanicsDeepLabCutJoints anglesMobileMotion capture

Identifiers

PMID34175570
PMCPMC8640714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.