Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34175246›Full record

ArticleJournal of geriatric oncology2021

Serological response to COVID-19 vaccination in patients with cancer older than 80 years.

Daniela Iacono, Linda Cerbone, Lucia Palombi, Elena Cavalieri, Isabella Sperduti, Rosario Andrea Cocchiara, Bruno Mariani, Gabriella Parisi, Carlo Garufi

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of geriatric oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Immunological and clinical efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in immunocompromised populations: a systematic review.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Pooled it
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. COVID-19 vaccination in cancer patients: a narrative review.The Journal of international medical research · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniela IaconoMedical Oncology, San Camillo - Forlanini Hospital, Circonvallazione Gianicolense 87, 00152 Rome, Italy.
Linda CerboneMedical Oncology, San Camillo - Forlanini Hospital, Circonvallazione Gianicolense 87, 00152 Rome, Italy.
Lucia PalombiBreast Unit, San Camillo - Forlanini Hospital, Circonvallazione Gianicolense 87, 00152 Rome, Italy.
Elena CavalieriUOC Haematology & Stem Cell Transplant Unit, San Camillo - Forlanini Hospital, Circonvallazione Gianicolense 87, 00152 Rome, Italy.
Isabella SperdutiBiostatistical Unit - Clinical Trials Center IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena, U.O. di Biostatistica e Bioinformatica - Direzione Scientifica, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy.
Rosario Andrea CocchiaraDepartment of Oncology, Health Direction Department San Camillo - Forlanini Hospital, Circonvallazione Gianicolense 87, 00152 Rome, Italy.
Bruno MarianiMicrobiology and Virology Unit, San Camillo - Forlanini Hospital, Circonvallazione Gianicolense 87, 00152 Rome, Italy.
Gabriella ParisiMicrobiology and Virology Unit, San Camillo - Forlanini Hospital, Circonvallazione Gianicolense 87, 00152 Rome, Italy.
Carlo GarufiMedical Oncology, San Camillo - Forlanini Hospital, Circonvallazione Gianicolense 87, 00152 Rome, Italy. Electronic address: cgarufi@scamilloforlanini.rm.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central studies carried out on vaccines against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV2) excluded patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy and those diagnosed with an immunosuppressive condition. Moreover, there are no data on vaccine efficacy regarding older patients with cancer.

objectivesThe primary objective was to evaluate the seroprevalence of the SARS-CoV2 IgG in older patients (aged ≥80 years) diagnosed with solid or hematological malignancies, one month after administering the second dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe screened 74 older patients with cancer, 45 of them accepted to receive the vaccination and collected serum samples from 36 patients; a group of medical doctors and nurses from our hospital was used as a control in a 1:2 ratio.

resultsThe median age was 82 years (range 80-89). Median serum IgG were 2396,10 AU/ml (range 0-32,763,00) in patients with cancer and 8737,49 AU/ml (398.90-976,280,00) in the control group, p < 0.0001. Additional subgroup analyses were performed comparing males and females, patients treated with chemotherapy versus other therapies (immunotherapy, targeted therapy), solid tumors versus hematological malignancies, early (I-II) versus advanced (III-IV) stage of disease, continuative corticosteroid use or not. None of them reached statistical significance.

conclusionOur study shows for the first time that patients with cancer aged ≥80 years can have a serological response to the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine one month after vaccination and consequently support the vaccination campaign currently underway in this frail population.

Indexed as

COVID-19NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansMaleRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2Seroepidemiologic StudiesVaccinationBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID34175246
PMCPMC8192957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.