ReviewHealthcare (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2021
Recommendations for strengthening the role of embedded researchers to accelerate implementation in health systems: Findings from a state-of-the-art (SOTA) conference workgroup.
Review in Healthcare (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Applying Implementation Science Methods to Prospectively Track the Adaptation of an Evidence-Based Deprescribing Intervention for Use in a New Health System and Country.The Permanente journal · 2026Trial
- Trial-Based Economic Evaluations Conducted alongside Studies Embedded in Australian Healthcare Services and Programs: A Scoping Review.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2026Review
- Early impact of the Liberian National Community Health Assistant Program on under-five mortality in Grand Bassa County: A non-randomized stepped wedge evaluation.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Structuring Collaboration Between Researchers and Operational Innovators: Diffusing New Practices Across the Veteran's Administration Healthcare System.Learning health systems · 2026Article
- The use of research evidence in blood collection policy and practice: a qualitative study with frontline staff, middle managers and senior managers.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- From consultors to collaborators - An SOP for advancing ethics engagement in science.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2025Article
- Embedding coproduction: translational impacts of a sustained research-policy coalition in Tasmania, Australia.Health promotion international · 2025Article
- Funding model for embedded research: Impacts, challenges, and lessons learned for investigators.Learning health systems · 2025Article
- How an evidence synthesis program's growth has supported research use and learning community partnership networks within a learning health system: A descriptive analysis and case series.Learning health systems · 2025Article
- Four distinct models of learning health systems: Strength through diversity.Learning health systems · 2025Article
- Towards a shared understanding of the learning health system in a large academic-based health system: A qualitative analysis.Health services management research · 2025Article
- Applying Implementation Science to Advance Electronic Health Record-Driven Learning Health Systems: Case Studies, Challenges, and Recommendations.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- The translation-to-policy learning cycle to improve public health.Learning health systems · 2024Article
- Life After the HSIF: Lessons From Diffusion of Innovation for Sustaining the Impact of Embeddedness Comment on "Early Career Outcomes of Embedded Research Fellows: An Analysis of the Health System Impact Fellowship Program".International journal of health policy and management · 2024Article
- Retrospective Impact Evaluation Continuing to Prove Challenging Irrespective of Setting: A Study of Research Impact Enablers and Challenges Cloaked as an Impact Evaluation? Comment on "'We're Not Providing the Best Care If We Are Not on the Cutting Edge of Research': A Research Impact Evaluation at a Regional Australian Hospital and Health Service".International journal of health policy and management · 2023Article
- Connecting the science and practice of implementation - applying the lens of context to inform study design in implementation research.Frontiers in health services · 2023Article
- How the VA is training the Next-Generation workforce for learning health systems.Learning health systems · 2022Article
- Evaluating clinician-led quality improvement initiatives: A system-wide embedded research partnership at Stanford Medicine.Learning health systems · 2022Article
- Promises and pitfalls in implementation science from the perspective of US-based researchers: learning from a pre-mortem.Implementation science : IS · 2022Article
- Community engagement to improve access to healthcare: a comparative case study to advance implementation science for transgender health equity.International journal for equity in health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTraditional research approaches do not promote timely implementation of evidence-based innovations (EBIs) to benefit patients. Embedding research within health systems can accelerate EBI implementation by blending rigorous methods with practical considerations in real-world settings. A state-of-the-art (SOTA) conference was convened in February 2019 with five workgroups that addressed five facets of embedded research and its potential to impact healthcare. This article reports on results from the workgroup focused on how embedded research programs can be implemented into heath systems for greatest impact.
methodsBased on a pre-conference survey, participants indicating interest in accelerating implementation were invited to participate in the SOTA workgroup. Workgroup participants (N = 26) developed recommendations using consensus-building methods. Ideas were grouped by thematic clusters and voted on to identify top recommendations. A summary was presented to the full SOTA membership. Following the conference, the workgroup facilitators (LJD, CDH, NR) summarized workgroup findings, member-checked with workgroup members, and were used to develop recommendations.
resultsThe workgroup developed 12 recommendations to optimize impact of embedded researchers within health systems. The group highlighted the tension between "ROI vs. R01" goals-where health systems focus on achieving return on their investments (ROI) while embedded researchers focus on obtaining research funding (R01). Recommendations are targeted to three key stakeholder groups: researchers, funders, and health systems. Consensus for an ideal foundation to support optimal embedded research is one that (1) maximizes learning; (2) aligns goals across all 3 stakeholders; and (3) implements EBIs in a consistent and timely fashion.
conclusionsFour cases illustrate a variety of ways that embedded research can be structured and conducted within systems, by demonstrating key embedded research values to enable collaborations with academic affiliates to generate actionable knowledge and meaningfully accelerate implementation of EBIs to benefit patients. IMPLICATIONS: Embedded research approaches have potential for transforming health systems and impacting patient health. Accelerating embedded research should be a focused priority for funding agencies to maximize a collective return on investment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.