Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34174917›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2021

Onset PrevenTIon of urinary retention in Orthopaedic Nursing and rehabilitation, OPTION-a study protocol for a randomised trial by a multi-professional facilitator team and their first-line managers' implementation strategy.

Ann Catrine Eldh, Eva Joelsson-Alm, Per Wretenberg, Maria Hälleberg-Nyman

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04700969 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Onset PrevenTIon of Urinary Retention in Orthopaedic Nursing and Rehabilitation, OPTION - a Knowledge Implementation Study on a Facilitation Strategy for Multi-professional Clinical Champion Teams

TypeinterventionalSponsorÖrebro University, SwedenRan2020 to 2027Enrolled20ConditionsUrinary Retention, Hip Fractures, Hip ArthritisArms: A support program to facilitate implementation of evidence-based practice for postoperative urinary retention
NCT05969145 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Hot-Cold Application to the Bladder After Orthopedic Surgery on Postoperative Urinary Retention

TypeinterventionalSponsorAnkara Yildirim Beyazıt UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsPostoperative Urinary RetentionArmsapplication of thermophor
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Adherence to evidence-based guidelines for prevention of urinary retention in hip surgery patients: a multicentre observational study.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2024
    Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ann Catrine EldhDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, SE-581 83, Linköping, Sweden. ann.catrine.eldh@liu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-7737-169X
Eva Joelsson-AlmDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset, SE-118 83, Stockholm, Sweden.
Per WretenbergFaculty of Health and Medicine, Department of Orthopedics, Örebro University, SE-701 82, Örebro, Sweden.
Maria Hälleberg-NymanFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Örebro University, SE-701 82, Örebro, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Onset PrevenTIon of urinary retention in Orthopaedic Nursing and rehabilitation, OPTION, project aims to progress knowledge translation vis-à-vis evidence-based bladder monitoring in orthopaedic care, to decrease the risk of urinary retention, and voiding complications. Urinary retention is common whilst in hospital for hip surgery. If not properly identified and managed, there is a high risk of complications, some lifelong and life threatening. Although evidence-based guidelines are available, the implementation is lagging.

methodsTwenty orthopaedic sites are cluster randomised into intervention and control sites, respectively. The intervention sites assemble local facilitator teams among nursing and rehabilitation staff, including first-line managers. The teams receive a 12-month support programme, including face-to-face events and on-demand components to map and bridge barriers to guideline implementation, addressing leadership behaviours and de-implementation of unproductive routines. All sites have access to the guidelines via a public healthcare resource, but the control sites have no implementation support. Baseline data collection includes structured assessments of urinary retention procedures via patient records, comprising incidence and severity of voiding issues and complications, plus interviews with managers and staff, and surveys to all hip surgery patients with interviews across all sites. Further assessments of context include the Alberta Context Tool used with staff, the 4Ps tool for preference-based patient participation used with patients, and data on economic aspects of urinary bladder care. During the implementation intervention, all events are recorded, and the facilitators keep diaries. Post intervention, the equivalent data collections will be repeated twice, and further data will include experiences of the intervention and guideline implementation. Data will be analysed with statistical analyses, including comparisons before and after, and between intervention and control sites. The qualitative data are subjected to content analysis, and mixed methods are applied to inform both clinical outcomes and the process evaluation, corresponding to a hybrid design addressing effectiveness, experiences, and outcomes. DISCUSSION: The OPTION trial has a potential to account for barriers and enablers for guideline implementation in the orthopaedic context in general and hip surgery care in particular. Further, it may progress the understanding of implementation leadership by dyads of facilitators and first-line managers.

trial registrationThe study was registered as NCT04700969 with the U.S. National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry on 8 January 2021, that is, prior to the baseline data collection.

Indexed as

Orthopedic NursingUrinary RetentionAlbertaHumansLeadershipUnited StatesEvidence-based practiceFacilitationGuidelineImplementationLeadershipNursingOrthopaedic careRehabilitationUrinary retention

Identifiers

PMID34174917
PMCPMC8233619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.