ArticleImplementation science : IS2021
Onset PrevenTIon of urinary retention in Orthopaedic Nursing and rehabilitation, OPTION-a study protocol for a randomised trial by a multi-professional facilitator team and their first-line managers' implementation strategy.
Article in Implementation science : IS, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Onset PrevenTIon of Urinary Retention in Orthopaedic Nursing and Rehabilitation, OPTION - a Knowledge Implementation Study on a Facilitation Strategy for Multi-professional Clinical Champion Teams
The Effect of Hot-Cold Application to the Bladder After Orthopedic Surgery on Postoperative Urinary Retention
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Contextual Factors Affecting Evidence-Based Practice in Orthopaedic Nursing and Rehabilitation: A Mixed Methods Study.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Considering Preference-Based Patient Participation-Scientific and Clinical Outcome Measures With the Patient Preferences for Patient Participation Tool.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- First-line managers' experience of guideline implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Article
- Nuancing the continuum from ideal to real-world implementation: a letter to the editor on Nilsen et al.Implementation science communications · 2025Article
- Prevalence of adverse events in hip and knee arthroplasties following the implementation of surgical checklists.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2025Article
- First-line managers' experience of guideline implementation in orthopaedic nursing and rehabilitation: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Adherence to evidence-based guidelines for prevention of urinary retention in hip surgery patients: a multicentre observational study.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2024Observational
- Design and management considerations for control groups in hybrid effectiveness-implementation trials: Narrative review & case studies.Frontiers in health services · 2023Review
- Facilitating facilitators to facilitate-Some general comments on a strategy for knowledge implementation in health services.Frontiers in health services · 2023Article
- Preoperative and Postoperative Residual Urine in 796 Men Older than 65 Years Undergoing Elective Orthopaedic Surgery in Denmark: A Single-Center Cohort Study.JB & JS open accessArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Onset PrevenTIon of urinary retention in Orthopaedic Nursing and rehabilitation, OPTION, project aims to progress knowledge translation vis-à-vis evidence-based bladder monitoring in orthopaedic care, to decrease the risk of urinary retention, and voiding complications. Urinary retention is common whilst in hospital for hip surgery. If not properly identified and managed, there is a high risk of complications, some lifelong and life threatening. Although evidence-based guidelines are available, the implementation is lagging.
methodsTwenty orthopaedic sites are cluster randomised into intervention and control sites, respectively. The intervention sites assemble local facilitator teams among nursing and rehabilitation staff, including first-line managers. The teams receive a 12-month support programme, including face-to-face events and on-demand components to map and bridge barriers to guideline implementation, addressing leadership behaviours and de-implementation of unproductive routines. All sites have access to the guidelines via a public healthcare resource, but the control sites have no implementation support. Baseline data collection includes structured assessments of urinary retention procedures via patient records, comprising incidence and severity of voiding issues and complications, plus interviews with managers and staff, and surveys to all hip surgery patients with interviews across all sites. Further assessments of context include the Alberta Context Tool used with staff, the 4Ps tool for preference-based patient participation used with patients, and data on economic aspects of urinary bladder care. During the implementation intervention, all events are recorded, and the facilitators keep diaries. Post intervention, the equivalent data collections will be repeated twice, and further data will include experiences of the intervention and guideline implementation. Data will be analysed with statistical analyses, including comparisons before and after, and between intervention and control sites. The qualitative data are subjected to content analysis, and mixed methods are applied to inform both clinical outcomes and the process evaluation, corresponding to a hybrid design addressing effectiveness, experiences, and outcomes. DISCUSSION: The OPTION trial has a potential to account for barriers and enablers for guideline implementation in the orthopaedic context in general and hip surgery care in particular. Further, it may progress the understanding of implementation leadership by dyads of facilitators and first-line managers.
trial registrationThe study was registered as NCT04700969 with the U.S. National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry on 8 January 2021, that is, prior to the baseline data collection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.