Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34174898›Full record

ReviewMicrobial cell factories2021

A critical review on various feedstocks as sustainable substrates for biosurfactants production: a way towards cleaner production.

Swayansu Sabyasachi Mohanty, Yamini Koul, Sunita Varjani, Ashok Pandey, Huu Hao Ngo, Jo-Shu Chang, Jonathan W C Wong, Xuan-Thanh Bui

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbial cell factories, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Microorganisms · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. HalotolerantRSC advances · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Optimisation of surfactin yield inComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. DoE-based medium optimization for improved biosurfactant production withFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Swayansu Sabyasachi MohantyGujarat Pollution Control Board, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, 382 010, India.
Yamini KoulGujarat Pollution Control Board, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, 382 010, India.
Sunita VarjaniGujarat Pollution Control Board, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, 382 010, India. drsvs18@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6966-7768
Ashok PandeyCSIR-Indian Institute of Toxicology Research, Lucknow, 226 001, India.
Huu Hao NgoCentre for Technology in Water and Wastewater, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia.
Jo-Shu ChangDepartment of Chemical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Jonathan W C WongInstitute of Bioresource and Agriculture, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong.
Xuan-Thanh BuiFaculty of Environment and Natural Resources, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HCMUT), Ho Chi Minh City, 700000, Vietnam.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quest for a chemical surfactant substitute has been fuelled by increased environmental awareness. The benefits that biosurfactants present like biodegradability, and biocompatibility over their chemical and synthetic counterparts has contributed immensely to their popularity and use in various industries such as petrochemicals, mining, metallurgy, agrochemicals, fertilizers, beverages, cosmetics, etc. With the growing demand for biosurfactants, researchers are looking for low-cost waste materials to use them as substrates, which will lower the manufacturing costs while providing waste management services as an add-on benefit. The use of low-cost substrates will significantly reduce the cost of producing biosurfactants. This paper discusses the use of various feedstocks in the production of biosurfactants, which not only reduces the cost of waste treatment but also provides an opportunity to profit from the sale of the biosurfactant. Furthermore, it includes state-of-the-art information about employing municipal solid waste as a sustainable feedstock for biosurfactant production, which has not been simultaneously covered in many published literatures on biosurfactant production from different feedstocks. It also addresses the myriad of other issues associated with the processing of biosurfactants, as well as the methods used to address these issues and perspectives, which will move society towards cleaner production.

Indexed as

Industrial MicrobiologyBiodegradation, EnvironmentalBiological ProductsGreen Chemistry TechnologySurface-Active AgentsWaste ManagementBiological ProductsSurface-Active AgentsAgro-industrial wasteBiosurfactantCleaner productionMunicipal solid waste

Identifiers

PMID34174898
PMCPMC8236176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.